Negotiating Notions of Identity Among Gender and Sexual Minorities of South India - JAY PULITANO


JAY PULITANO is a under graduate student of Sara Lawrence College, New York, She also volunteers GLAAD
This study is part of
South India Term Abroad Fall 2013
Independent Study Project
April 11, 2014, Madurai


I. Introduction
Though I naively considered myself on guard against such biases, I definitely began this project with assumptions that the Indian hijra community was homogenous to a much larger extent than it actually is. For one thing, I assumed that “hijra” was the term commonly used by all in India to refer to what I as an American call “transgender.” I quickly learned that south India has its own regional term, thirunangai, but that even this was not unanimously preferred or even defined in the same way by all. For example, one of my participants defined the thirunangai community of Tamil Nadu as distinct from the hijra community of the north. Another one of my participants, on the other hand, defined hijra as a “community identity” for all transgender people in India, including the south, while thirunangai referred to a word used as a “gender identity” for transgender southerners.
            I began my research with the question, “What is the Indian context for how South Indian trans* people imagine themselves, their community, and gender in general?” Region was not the only factor that seemed to affect how this community was conceptualized. Throughout my research, I found that various factors and forces such as class, education level, religious conservatism, Western influences, and nationalism seemed to largely affect how this community as well as gender and sexuality in general was imagined. Such observations helped to illuminate that gender and sexuality in general as a subjective experience are largely dependent on the social context. Moreover, I would also argue that such imaginings, like the social context on which they depend, are complex, dynamic, and fluid processes that are constantly being negotiated.
This paper’s layout in demonstrating these arguments will be as follows: First, I will position my language and my background; second, I will describe my methods of research as well as both their benefits and limitations; third, I will describe two (oversimplified) models of gender and sexuality according to a “modern” “Western” perspective and a “traditional” “Indian” perspective; fourth, I will problematize these models through an analysis incorporating interview data; and finally, I will reflect on the overall learning experiences of the project and summarize my conclusions.
            A couple notes should be made before continuing to the rest of the paper. I argued above that certain social contextual factors affected how “this community as well as gender and sexuality in general was imagined.” A Western audience may question why I include sexuality in an analysis of an Indian transgender community because, as I will describe below, a modern, Western perspective tends to view gender and sexuality as separate, isolated qualities of a person. I do include sexuality as a point of interest, however, because not only are the politics and experiences of sexual minorities often (though certainly not always) intersect with those of gender minorities, but unlike in a modern, Western conception, sexuality is tied into a traditional hijra imagining of gender, which will also be described in more detail below.
            My second note concerns my choice in my use of language for describing this Indian community of interest. The difficulty in attempting to use the most appropriate language to describe this community lies in the fact (a fact this paper attempts to explore in depth), as I began to describe in my opening, that different Indians of this community disagree over which language is most appropriate as well as the definitions of certain terms. One of the reasons the term “hijra” is because, as described above, it may have a specific regional connotation of the north. A more specifically southern term is Ali, but the community has largely abandoned the use of this term for a new term, Aravani, had been coined that was coined in the 1990s (April 5, 2014. Interview with Toya). Aravani, however, has strong Hindu religious connotations, so in an attempt to be more religiously inclusive, South Indian scholars coined year another term, thirunangai, literally translating to “Mr. Female” or “Male female,” within the past ten years (March 18, 2014. Interview with Gopi). Thirunangai has since been largely accepted by many within the community as well as by Tamil public as a whole, but aravani is still also in wide use, based on the mentioning of the term by my participants. As revealed by some of my participants, thirunangai is not a unanimously accepted ideal term. One of my participants, Gopi, criticized it for being invented by scholars as opposed to the community itself, and for not being a “traditional” term. Another one of my participants, Toya, expressed that she ideally prefers maatru paaliner, the direct Tamil translation of “transgender,” a preference that I gathered was related to her criticism of terms like “third gender” or “third sex” used by the Indian government and Indian mainstream society as well as her identity as a female (April 5 2014. Interview).
            I am very open to criticism of my choice and to more reflection on the topic, but for the purposes of this essay I have chosen to use the terms “trans*” and “queer” as umbrella terms to describe the Indian community of interest. This choice is guided by Naisargi N. Dave’s own explanation for her choice in language in Queer Activism in India, one of this paper’s primary sources. Though one may criticize this language on the grounds of instilling Western notions on a formerly colonized people – and this critique certainly must be taken seriously as Dave crucially notes – such a criticism has significant limitations (Dave 2012:20). Throughout my participant observation and interviews, I observed the use of Western terms such as transgender, queer, gay, lesbian. It would thus simply be inaccurate to assume that Indians cannot or do not think of themselves with such Western terms and notions. Both the terms trans* and queer as umbrella terms were coined with an inclusive intent, purposely not having any specific meaning other than referring to gender and sexual minorities. Despite this inclusive intent, a limitation of these terms is that the people they refer to do not necessarily identify as them. Because of this limitation, I will also try to use the terms “gender and sexual minorities,” but this has limitations in that it does not necessarily describe a self-aware community of people. For most of my references, however, I will use terms as described specifically by an individual or group of people. I will tend to use “trans*” and “queer” as well as “gender and sexual minorities,” however, for instances in which a group is not self-described.  
            In terms of positioning myself, my analysis will inevitably be biased by my background. I am a middle-class, educated, white, 21 year old American. I am female assigned at birth and identify on the trans*masculine spectrum. My ideas of gender from a specific progressive Western context will likely influence my analysis, though hopefully it will also allow me to make comparisons and “other” my own culture and beliefs.
II. Methods
            The methodology of this project included both scholarly research and ethnographic work. The primary text used for understanding the traditional hijra imagining of gender and sexuality is With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India by Gayatri Reddy. Based heavily on ethnographic work in Hyderabad, Reddy describes in detail what can be categorized as traditional hijra notions of gender, discusses the influences of Western notions of gender on this community, and also problematizes the construction of a simple dichotomy between the two. Additionally, throughout With Respect to Sex, Reddy constructs an argument of how “other axes of identity, including religion, gender, kinship, and class” intersect with “the axis of sexual difference through which hijras have traditionally been understood” (Reddy 2006:17). Reddy’s arguments have largely guided this paper’s themes. A book that largely compliments Reddy’s book is the autobiography The Truth About Me: A Hijra Life Story by A. Revathi, the first published hijra autobiography to be translated into English. Revathi’s autobiography reflects much of Reddy’s descriptions of hijra rituals, kinship relations, and, often with heart-wrenching detail, the violence and persecution of Indian society that forces many hijras into sex work, giving a vivid perspective on the influence of class on this paper’s themes. Another crucial text utilized is Dave’s Queer Activism. While Dave’s text primarily focuses on the emergence and evolution of lesbian identity and activism in India, Dave’s arguments and observations are in large part extendable to trans* and queer Indian identity in general.
            The ethnographic research for this paper included both formal interviews and participant observation. For the participant observation portion, this included visiting the home of who I was told was the head of the thirunangai movement in Madurai, Madhavi Palvannan, which also acted as a shelter for thirunangai and koti individuals; attending a National Seminar on Transgender Social Exclusion in Trichy; and informal interactions with my primary participant, Gopi Shankar.
            In the beginning stages of my project when I was asking around for contacts, everybody I talked to thought of Madhavi and recommended I try to get in contact with her. It was my host father, chief editor of a major newspaper in Madurai, who was able to finally contact her for me, having already interviewed her multiple times for articles highlighting her achievements as an activist. Such achievements spreading awareness of HIV AIDS in the transgender community as a master trainer of Tamil Nadu AIDS Control Society, as well changing attitudes towards the transgender community among the police force as a State-level police advocacy officer.
Meeting Madhavi was particularly memorable not only because she was my first participant but also because the meeting was very different from my expectations in a way that is telling of my background as a middle class American. When I first was given her address, I was told it was the address of her organization, Madhavi Palvannan Trust, in Madurai’s business district. This gave me the impression that I was visiting the office headquarters of an NGO; that when I arrived there, I would be led to Madhavi’s office to speak to her privately and would probably be given a semi-prepared talk typically told to reporters. Instead, the auto rickshaw driver brought us (us being myself and Laurah, the resident director of SITA who attended this meeting with me as a translator) to a small alleyway where there were many cloth and garment shops with bright signs in Tamil filling the upper periphery of vision. It was early evening, about five thirty on a Tuesday. Finally somebody pointed us to a narrow doorway. Looking in I could see a steep set of thirty stairs or so rising up a dark, cement passageway, making for an intimidating climb that mirrored my anxiety for the occasion.
At the top of the stairs was a very modest apartment crowded with a dozen or so both thirunangai women as well as people who appeared to me as “regular men.” Like any other “man” that could be seen in Madurai, they had short hair and wore button down shirts and jeans. The thirunangai women, contrastingly, were like “regular women” in Madurai, having long hair neatly pulled back and decked with colorful saris and bangles; the only features making them seem different from a “typical woman” were their broad shoulders and jawlines. We put our hands together in respect and greeted one another with “Vannakkam”s and “Hello”s while smiling shyly. Others seemed to ignore us and kept talking with each other. One woman gave each of us a one-armed, half hug, which made an impression on me since hugging was in my experience almost non-existent in Tamil culture. Was she hugging us because we were foreigners, assuming we had different expectations for greetings? Or did this queer space have a different culture from that of mainstream Tamil society? I wondered.
We were led through a small doorway with a pointed arch into a room even smaller than the first. In this room, a group of three or four women were sitting on a bed set against a wall, with a window shining in sunlight behind them, while talking with another group sitting on the floor. It struck me as odd to have a bedroom function as such a public space – the room seemed more of an extension of the living room area than someone’s bedroom. One thirunangai woman – who I initially thought was Madhavi – introduced one of the people appearing as a “man” to me on the floor as her daughter. This person later introduced herself as Rama and said she was a koti. A pink, plastic chair was pulled out for me to sit in; Laurah was offered a spot on the bed. We were both offered tea as well as cake from a mini fridge behind me against the wall. The room was hot and a bit overwhelming, filled with the voices of everyone chatting loudly with one another in Tamil. It was difficult and confusing to figure out who Madhavi was amongst the scattered “hello”s and introductions. I had the expectation that Madhavi would make a clear introduction of herself and give me individual attention, but instead everybody eventually talked amongst themselves, and I found it difficult jump into the conversations and to think of what to say. Now looking back, it does not surprise me that Madhavi had not made a bigger effort to introduce herself. When a translator of mine later attempted to make an appointment for me with Madhavi, he asked afterwards if Madhavi was an “older” person because she spoke with “much authority.” Laurah too had once commented that Madhavi spoke with short declarative statements on the phone and hung up before she could ask any more questions. This is only one sign among many that Madhavi is a figure of power.
Laurah asked some questions, and at one point asked if there were any transmen out in the area. Another person appearing as a “man” to me, sitting on the floor hugging her bent legs relaxingly, responded in English that there were only two transmen out. Both were in Chennai, a more cosmopolitan city. She explained that the queer community was very male-dominated, and somebody made a comment in Tamil with the word “lesbian,” which she then translated to say there are some lesbians. This interaction was noteworthy for a couple of reasons. It helped confirm an obvious fact that the transgender community is extremely dominated by male-assigned people. Throughout my research, it was obvious that this fact heavily influenced how gender and the rights of gender minorities were conceptualized by the Indian trans* and queer community as a whole as well as in mainstream Indian society. This theme will be discussed more extensively later in the essay. The second point worth noting is that Western terms such as “queer” and “lesbian” were being used. Admittedly, the term “queer” was used by Rama who was a very strong English speaker. Her strength in English as well as the fact that she shared she was doing research indicate a high level of education and perhaps more exposure to Western terminology. One must also remember Dave’s point, however, that one must not assume that less educated Indians cannot use Western terminology (Dave 2012:20). Nonetheless, assuming the weaker English speakers would be most comfortable using Tamil terms, it is interesting to note that they used the word “lesbian” over a Tamil equivalent. This indicates the visibility of female queerness is a recent one in this society. Reddy’s ethnography was only undergone a couple of decades ago, yet whenever Reddy brought up lesbianism, her participants responded with incredulousness at the idea of two women being able to be sexually involved (Reddy 2006:52).
Our discussion at Madhavi’s went on for a little while longer, but seemed to quickly fizzle back into everyone else’s own conversations in Tamil. Laurah kept gesturing at me to say something. I searched for someone to make eye contact with, but everyone seemed occupied in conversation. Eventually I gave up and awkwardly said to no one in particular, “I was curious to hear if there were any transmen because I personally identify on the trans male spectrum,” and I tried explaining about my independent study and how I was interested in interviewing people. Some attention seemed to shift back to me, and a couple people asked Laurah what I had said. After a few moments of Laurah translating, somebody said, “Ohh, he’s one of us?” Laurah told me later that when I shared my own identity, she felt the guard go down in the room, and I definitely felt it then too. Such an impression is indicative that though there are many social differences between us, our shared identity as gender minorities does allow us to understand one another on one level.
            By no means, however, is that basic point meant to deemphasize the social differences that do exist between this group at Madhavi’s apartment and myself. If Madhavi was not somewhat brusque, she certainly lacked an excessively “flowery” personality. Though this again may have at least in part been reflective of her position of power, it also was probably indicative of a rough past that rendered such a personality necessary for survival. As Laurah said later, “She was tough. She seemed like she’d seen a lot.” One can be fairly confident with such a conjecture based on the extreme rates of prostitution and violence reported among thirunangai women, as will be described below. When Laurah was sitting on the bed, one of the women sitting next to her began to rub Laurah’s back uncomfortably low. Laurah later described that such behavior is very common among thirunangai women, and that the behavior “is about power.” This account may be related to Reddy’s descriptions of hijras using obscene language in public and even lifting their saris to expose their operative status in order to shame their audience into giving the demanded amount of money (Reddy 2006:140). One of my participants, Toya, also describes how

generally Indian transwomen behave very differently as exaggerated behavior which is stimulated and encouraged by group living (Community)… The community influence one to have a extra hip shake, using abusive language and clap hands in public. It is mere threatening way to collect easy free money from the public and attract clients in sex work. (April 5 2014. Interviews)

Such observations are indicative of the class differences Madhavi and these women come from.
            Other suggestions of differences from American trans* culture include the references to adopted kinship relations – such as the woman introducing the koti as her “daughter” – as well as the use of terminology such as koti at all. These uniquely “traditional” Indian notions will be described later in more detail.
            Unfortunately, I was never able schedule a follow-up meeting with Madhavi and formally interview her. However, the observations made at this first meeting as well as the comments made about Madhavi from another one of my participants provides interesting material for this paper’s analysis.
            My second major participant observation event was at a National Seminar on Transgender Social Exclusion at Bharatridasan University in Trichy. I was able to attend the second day of the conference, arriving around noon on Saturday, February 22nd, 2014. I learned about the conference from the Facebook page of Srishti Madurai, a group my friend ran across online. Srishti Madurai was founded in September 2011 as a Genderqueer & LGBTQIA student volunteer group. The group educated the public on these issues, giving talks at schools and conducting Asia’s first Genderqueer Pride Parade in Madurai. Later, Srishti Madurai evolved to give members free courses on studies not available in mainstream Indian academics, including not only Queer & Genderqueer studies but also expanding to a wide variety of disciplines ranging from psychoanalysis, biology, theology, and Marxism. Srishti Madurai’s founder, Gopi Shankar, is a 22-year-old undergraduate student at American College, the primary participant of this project, and a new friend of mine. Gopi self-identifies as androgynous or agender.
I met Gopi in person for the first time at the conference. She was waiting outside the campus’ social policy center for my translator and me on the early, hot and sunny afternoon. Tall and lanky, Gopi was fashionably attired with skinny jeans and a short, white and black kurta, where a metal amulet on a black leather string stuck out of her v-neck, smartly matching her black-rimmed glasses. Her bushy head of curly hair stood out compared to the typical short-cropped “male” haircuts seen in Tamil Nadu. In other words, she would blend in relatively well with a group of South Indian “males,” but her appearance definitely had a subtle feminine flair as well; she mixed masculinity and femininity into her androgynous gender expression. Our introductions were relatively awkward. I greeted her inappropriately formally with folded hands; and she made a comment on my appearance while giving my shoulder a squeeze, which caught me on guard as an American with a culturally larger space bubble. The difference in expectations wasn’t only cultural, though; I tend to be socially reserved, while Gopi – as I soon learned that day – has an open, affectionate personality.
Throughout my experience with this project, in fact, I received several unexpected signs of affection from the trans* people I met. Both at the conference and at Madhavi’s apartment, transwomen put their arms around me and took pictures with me. When I first met Sachi, for example, a prominent transgender activist and actress, she told me to “come with me, darling,” and walked with me with her arm wrapped around my shoulder. When I met Sachi again for an interview, she had greeted me with three kisses on the cheek. Throughout these interactions, it was difficult to tell to what extent my impressions were resultant of our cultural socializations and to what extent I was being treated in such a manner because I shared that I am trans* or because I am a foreigner. Compared to my interactions with general Indians, however, I suspected at least to some extent there was a culture among the Indian trans* community of displaying more affection among others within the community as compared to general society.
Sachi made an impression on my in other respects as well. She is a beautiful, young woman – perhaps in her early thirties – with an elegant voice and poised presence. She stood out to me from the other transwomen I had met so far because of her more Western style dress; rather than wearing a sari, she wore fitted jeans and a simple, stylish blouse, accessorized with the usual make-up and array of jewelry – bangles, a necklace, and earrings. She alternated between wearing her long silky hair down and in a loose ponytail. All of the other transwomen I met wore traditional, colorful saris and wore their hair back.
One such woman, 23-year-old Jaya, I had only met briefly at the conference. When I had the opportunity to interview her a few weeks later, however, I got a better taste of her personality. She had an unembarrassed brusque manner, a having guarded “tough” shell similar to Madhavi’s. She was also very passionate; Jaya was not afraid to challenge my questions and take control of the conversation, and she went on long fervent tangents about transgender rights and issues, whether or not they were directly related to my questions. Despite her young age, Jaya has been influential in expanding transgender rights. She gained considerable media attention when she protested her denied access to take a civil examination, eventually forcing the government to change its decision and opening up opportunities previously denied to the transgender population, according to Gopi.
Also impressionable to me was Toya, another prominent transgender activist I met at the conference. Toya is 39 years old, from Chennai, and was exceedingly friendly and personable. In our brief initial conversation, she critiqued mainstream Indian society’s use of the term “third gender,” saying she was not a third gender but a woman. Such mainstream language referring to the transgender population as the “third gender” or “third sex” was prevalent at the conference.
The conference as a whole appeared to appeal to a mainstream Indian audience. The speeches involved a basic level of education, explaining that thirunangai was the respectful term (although as just noted, the conference apparently did not use language that was respectful for all), describing male-assigned sex reassignment surgery (I was confused why this was necessary), highlighting the abysmal level of abuse and discrimination that thirunangai women face, and describing the lack of legal protection. Though many of these issues are vitally important to raise awareness for, the level of inclusion was extremely limited. The conference was on “transgender social” exclusion, yet virtually all of the speeches in reference to “transgender” people assumed the population was male-assigned and had undergone or aspired to undergo sexual reassignment surgery. Indeed, all of the featured transgender attendees of the conference entirely consisted of such a population. They all were clearly living as female in society, wearing saris, having long hair and smooth skin. This group of consisted of maybe six or seven women and took up a corner of the room seated up front. The conference room itself was relatively small with perhaps sixty or so people in attendance.
One portion of the brochure to the conference was also revealing of the assumptions inherent this mainstream conceptualization of “transgender.” In the brochure was a section listing the costs of attending the seminar if you were a student, a researcher, from an NGO, etc., all requiring varying fees. One category was merely listed as “Transgender” and listed as “0 Rupees” for attendance. While the intention to help a generally extremely marginalized population is admirable, the listing problematically assumed that who was “transgender” would be an obvious fact. What about somebody who was questioning their gender identity? Or somebody who was in the closet? Or somebody who prefers not to describe themselves as transgender but as a non-binary identity, for example? How is the conference determining who is “transgender”? What evidence are they basing these decisions on? No such questions are considered in the brochure, which merely lists the lack of a fee and no added comments. This suggests that to mainstream Indian society, one is not considered a “real” “transgender” unless one physically appears to be so.
Gopi’s speech was a notable exception to the male-assigned-at-birth bias. She strongly critiqued the exclusion of female-assigned transgender people and non-binary genders. As she later said to me in an interview, “They only talk about male to female, they never even open up their mouth about female to male people. That’s why I say, if you’re only going to talk about transwomen, don’t call them transgender, call them a transwoman” (March 18 2014. Interview).
            Besides these people I have described at the conference, I also interviewed a 22-year-old man, Sam, who I was introduced to by another participant and who is a microbiology graduate student at a college in Madurai. Sam was very articulate and thoughtful throughout the interview, had a gentle personality and warm smile, as well as a kind laugh. He is of a slightly heavy build and sports a well-groomed beard, but like Gopi also deliberately incorporates some androgyny into his attire. He wore jeans and a tasteful men’s style long kurta, a choice that stood out compared to the other young men on campus who all wore button-down shirts. In describing a more feminine period of his life, Sam told me,

Sam: After I came out as gay, after some two months, I found some kind of change in me, in some kind of tendency to be like, to be more feminine, to wear women’s clothes or something like.
Jay Pulitano: Wear women’s clothes, like on campus?
S: Ahh, kind of, kind of, that I will tell [laughs] … Actually [indistinguishable] in my very, very small age, like before ten or something, I had few experience of cross-dressing. I would just wear my mom’s sari, and I would just dance [laughs] That is very funny, very small kid thing, many kids they will do it. But uh, at this time, I am kind of rational creature [laughs] I am 19 or 20, and I was just thinking, “What’s this thing?” And one day, one fine day, I took eyeliner, I put some lip-gloss, but everything else will be in male attire, and I went to class. And everyone was seeing me, “What happened?” Already they were not talking to me because they knew I was gay or something like that [indistinguishable]. As time passed, I had changed a lot, I had adapted to this kurta like this, being more kind of androgynous I guess, because females they will also have this kind of top, but they will have a kind of different thing in India. So I had adopted this. [indistinguishable] eyeliner, I did that too, and I put a lot of lip-gloss. Only one thing I didn’t do was my hair. [laughs] And I put a lot of make-up [nail polish] in my hands. One my friends, close friends in my college, he used to comment, ‘Even the girls of this college, they are not having this nail polish! But you are having it. How come you are doing like this?’ [laughs] Like I will be having this kind of thing. [indistinguishable] At that time I came to know as a genderqueer person (April 1, 2014. Interview)

Even though Sam now identifies as male and no longer wears make-up and nail polish, he continues to wear his self-described androgynous kurtas. Like Sam, several of my participants also described the importance they held in clothes and make-up in expressing their genders. Sam was an interesting person to interview because of the dramatic shifts in viewpoints he described evolving through his life in the recent past. Only “three or four months back,” Sam was “completely anti-church…a strict atheist” and believed nothing was wrong with his attraction towards men as a homosexual (April 1, 2014. Interview). Since then, however, he “found [himself] identifying more and more with the morals of the [Catholic] church,” and now currently believes that though he is unable to control his sexual attraction towards men, it is against the “Order of Nature” and thus sinful to act on those attractions (April 1, 2014. Interview). Sam’s articulate, personal narrative of this dramatic shift in moral understanding was helps demonstate the potential of mixing liberal and conservative views in forming conceptions of gender and sexuality.
            These five people – Gopi, Sachi, Jaya, Toya, and Sam – constituted the small sample of participants I interviewed for this study. They all are given pseudonyms except for Gopi who insisted her real name be used. All of the participants grew up at least in part in Tamil Nadu, rendering their perspective primarily specific to South India. My ethnographic data is also very limited in perspective due to the fact that all of my participants have received higher forms of education and none of my participants are female assigned at birth. I am thus lacking the perspective of people from lower socio-economic classes and lower levels of education as well as a female-assigned perspective. The class bias is partially removed from reading Revathi’s and Reddy’s texts as well as from my participant observation at Madhavi’s home. While my participants’ socio-economic background has limitations, it does provide for an interesting perspective. My participants’ level of education arguably renders them more likely to be exposed to Western notions of gender and sexuality as well as to the critiques of being exposed to such notions. This can provide an interesting angle in an era of globalization in examining how participants negotiate “Western” and “Indian” notions of gender and sexual minorities and their rights.
            I interviewed all of my participants in Madurai, except for Toya who I corresponded with via e-mail. I interviewed Sam on his college campus for an hour and forty five minutes. Sachi was in Madurai for the day giving a talk at a local college, so I interviewed her for a half hour afterwards at the college. I also interviewed Jaya for about a half hour outside the Ghandi Museum, a public area in the city. Unlike my other participants, Jaya wished to not have the interview recorded, so her quotes are recounted only from written notes and memory. Jaya was also my only participant who I interviewed with a translator in Tamil. The rest of my participants, also being native Tamil speakers, had strong enough levels of English to communicate, but efforts were clearly made at expressing ideas in a second language, suggesting a communication barrier may have been present. Using a translator for Jaya as well as in my participant observation also inevitably involved a loss of meaning.
            Although I am grateful for all of my participants, I am especially indebted to Gopi for all of her time and aid in contributing to this project. Gopi was my primary participant, formally interviewing with me for a total of two and a half hours, informally interacting with me through participant observation for countless hours, and introducing me to all of my participants. As a result of Gopi’s greater proportion in participation as well as her large contribution of rich and thought-provoking comments, much of this paper’s analysis will focus on her.

III. “Traditional” vs. “Western” Models of Gender and Sexuality
            Guided by Reddy’s chapter, “Crossing ‘Lines’ of Subjectivity: Transnational Movements and Gay Identifications” in With Respect to Sex, this analysis will begin by outlining simplified models of the “traditional,” “Indian” conceptions of gender and sexuality versus the “modern,” “Western” conceptions. Though I will argue that constructing such an oversimplified dichotomy is problematic, beginning the analysis in this way will be helpful for demonstrating such an argument.
            Reddy describes in great detail the notions of gender and sexuality as imagined by the participants of her ethnography. I will primarily use her work to construct the oversimplified “traditional,” “Indian” model of gender and sexuality. According to Reddy, her participants conceptualize three categories of genders: naran, panti, and koti (Reddy 2006:214). Narans are an undifferentiated category of “women” and are defined as such primarily by their anatomy, “the ability to bear children being the single and most potent marker of difference” (Reddy 2006:51), as well as by their “gendered practice” (Reddy 2006:214). Kotis and pantis, on the other hand, refer to people who are male assigned at birth. Koti is an umbrella category containing within it a range of subcategories, one of which includes hijras (cite?). Considered “not narans” but only “like narans” (Reddy 2006:50), kotis are broadly defined by their receptive sexual role as well as other gendered behavior beyond the sexual realm (Reddy 2006:46). Such gendered behavior includes, “As one hijra said, echoing many others, ‘From birth, I always like to put moggus [rice-flour designs drawn on the ground, typically by women], play with girls, and help with the cooking and cleaning’” (Reddy 2006:46).
            Out of all the types of kotis, hijras are the most visible category (Reddy 2006:58). They wear saris full-time (Reddy 2006:131), have long hair (Reddy 2006:128-9), and beautify their bodies with make-up and jewelry (Reddy 2006:127-8). Besides additive methods for feminization, hijras also engage in methods to erase the more masculine aspects of their bodies (Reddy 2006:124). This includes hair-plucking (Reddy 2006:124-5); the use of hormones to feminize body shape, make skin smoother, and grow breasts (Reddy 2006:132-3); and, perhaps most importantly, the nirvan operation, or removal of the penis and testes (Reddy 2006:56). According to Reddy, nearly all hijras have undergone or desire to undergo the nirvan operation (Reddy 2006:93). In addition to these physical adjustments in appearance, hijras also emphasize particular gendered behavior such cooking and dancing, which can also be characteristic of kotis in general (Reddy 2006:122). In line with this gendered component of the hijra ideal, hijras take great pleasure out of “passing” for women (Reddy 2006:123). The ability to “pass” is highly valued by hijras and those with greater “passing” abilities are looked upon with higher respect (Reddy 2006:123).
            Hijra behavior cannot only be categorized as “imitating” women as perfectly as possible, fitting perfectly into gender norms; hijra behavior also involves components that are subversive to gender norms (Reddy 2006:136). Probably the most distinctive of such behavior is the loud clapping of hands, which marks association with the hijra community (Reddy 2006:136-7). Reddy describes other examples of such behavior, including exaggerated hip swinging; aggression, such as extensive verbal abuse; and “demonstrations of ‘shamelessness’ signified by the potential exposure of (mutilated) genitalia” (Reddy 2006:55). Reddy’s examples strongly reflect Toya’s description of the community’s “exaggerated behavior” above.
            A couple of weeks ago I was riding back to Madurai on a public bus with Gopi, having just accompanied her to a talk she gave at Gandhi Gram Rural University on non-binary identities. When we found two empty seats, Gopi stood back to let me sit down first. I assumed this was because a woman was sitting in the third seat by the window, and it would be inappropriate in Tamil Nadu for a “man” to sit next to a female stranger when a “woman” could instead. After we took our seats, I immediately found my sandwiched spot uncomfortable. The tall, young woman sitting next to me had her legs spread out wide and did not make any attempts to give me space. Though I sat with my legs squeezed together, Gopi was forced to sit with almost half her body off the seat with her left leg hanging out in the aisle. The stranger’s posture struck me as very unusual for a Tamil woman, or even for a Tamil man for that matter; in my experience courteous behavior was typical among South Indians. Women especially, however, are expected to be reserved and not draw attention to themselves. I thus found myself even more surprised when the woman chatted loudly in Tamil, smiled, and giggled with two young men in the row in front of us. Forcing me to squeeze back and contain the space my body took up even more, the woman reached in front of me to playfully whack the back of the head of the man closest to the aisle. At this point I started to consciously examine her voice, which indeed seemed deep to me. However, I was cautious to make assumptions: “Surely this would be too good a coincidence,” I thought. “Listening to Gopi talk about gender minorities for an hour and a half is just making my brain look for signs,” I told myself. I continued quietly observing her in my uncomfortable seating position. She indeed was tall and broad shouldered, but at the same time her smooth skin and sari made her look like “any other” Tamil woman.
            “She’s a transwoman,” Gopi said to me.
            “I thought maybe…”
            “Definitely.”
            The chance encounter left a vivid impression on me. I expected Indian transwomen to try to “blend in,” but instead this woman completely subverted my gender expectations for her. This unembarrassed “exaggerated behavior” certainly complicates the notion that Indian transwomen are trying “imitate” the appearance and behavior of ciswomen as much as possible.
            Another major characteristic of the hijra community is its extensive network of ritualistic, adopted kinship relations. When I asked Sachi what relations were like within “[her] community,” she responded, “It’s sisters. It’s mostly, it’s mostly matriarchal relationships. Sisters, mothers, specifically… Daughter, daughter-in-law, granddaughter [indistinguishable] lot of beautiful relationships. Very beautiful”(March 14, 2014. Interview). Indeed, often rejected by their families of origin, these kinship relations provide emotional and material support (Reddy 2006:157). Revathi described feeling an “inexplicable love” between her and her first guru the day she had adopted her as her chela, or daughter (Revathi 2010:23). She wrote, “I could not bear being parted from her, she who had understood my feelings, respected me, sought to guide me” (Revathi 2010:26). These relations also, however, often involve many conflicts as well. The gurus and nayaks, or heads of houses, hold much authority over their chelas who are held under strict community rules, which can cause much tension as extensively described in Reddy’s text (Reddy 2006:158). I also got a small sense of this during our chance encounter on the bus: After enquiring where she was from and which “chief” she was under, Gopi told me confidently that the transwoman must have lied to her about which “chief” she belonged to in order to not “get in trouble” for traveling to another city. When I asked Gopi if everybody in the trans community was in these kinship networks, she said, “98%. The ones who don’t, don’t have respect.” This is reflective of Reddy’s description that without a kinship network, a hijra is illegitimate and not a “real” hijra in the eyes of other members of the community (Reddy 2006:154).
            The final characteristics of a “traditional” hijra that I will discuss are the competing ideal of asexuality and sexuality with pantis. Among hijras, there are two hierarchical subgroups based upon occupation: kandra hijras, or sex workers; and badhai hijras, or ritual practitioners who are “believed to be endowed with the power to confer fertility on newly weds” (Reddy 2006:56), and are considered among all hijras to be the more respected occupation (Reddy 2006:81). The power of badhai hijras is legitimized through the Hindu belief in asceticism, associated in the human world as opposed to sexuality and fertility, paradoxically is associated in the mythical world with erotic and procreative power (Reddy 2006:85-6). Hindu myths recount gods who attain their creative and sexual powers through sustained chastity, only to have this power lost when their chastity is broken (Reddy 2006:85-6).
            Reddy draws an interesting parallel between an ideal of the hijra life trajectory and evolution of Hindu philosophy. Historically, another path to liberation in Hindu philosophy – in contrast to the path of tapas where liberation is attained through asceticism – is the path of tantra or sexual eroticism. These mutually exclusive, opposing paths were eventually somewhat philosophically resolved through the development of the four asramas, or life stages: “Simply stated, the ideal life according to Vedic scripture, consists of four asramas, or stages of life, namely brahmacarya, the period of education and discipleship; grhastya, the life of the householder; vanaprasta, the life of a hermit, preparatory to the last stage; and sannyasa or the life of an ascetic” (Reddy 2006:88). Like the four asramas, many hijras understand their life cycle to begin as a kandra hijra in their youth and then later to claim asexuality and become a badhai hijra (Reddy 2006:91). This can explain the contradicting qualifications of being a “real” hijra – many hijras claim that all hijras desire pantis (men who are not kotis), while others claim that hijras are devoid of sexual desire at all (Reddy 2006:79).
            With the characteristics of a “traditional” hijra now illustrated, I will briefly outline other categories of kotis. Reddy extensively describes a wide variety of koti categories, which interestingly include distinctions solely based on religion, I will contain my focus to zanana kotis, kada-catla kotis, and AC/DCs. Zanana kotis can be summed up as “those kada-catla kotis [non-sari-wearing kotis] who have rit [initiation into the adopted kinship networks]” (Reddy 2006:62). Unlike hijras, zenana kotis “pass” in public, appearing as “any other man.” When in a group of other kotis, however, their behavior transforms to more feminine gestures and speech patterns (Reddy 2006:60-1). Though they do not live in group housing as hijras do, they have their own network of adopted kinship relations which garners them much respect among hijras (Reddy 2006:63). Unlike hijras, though, zenana kotis do not undergo the nirvan operation (Reddy 2006:62). However, similar to badhai hijras, zenana kotis’ main occupation of singing and dancing is legitimized through historical tradition (Reddy 2006:62).
            The primary difference between kada-catla kotis and zenana kotis is that kada-catla kotis do not have rit, garnering them far less respect from the view of the hijra community (Reddy 2006:64). Kada-catla kotis are also garnered less respect from hijras because of their high enjoyment of “homosex,” a characterization not only described by hijras but also kada-catla kotis themselves, who state that “they are in this line for the sex and excitement” (Reddy 2006:64). These qualities demonstrate the hijra ideal of asexuality and the importance of kinship relations in hijra identity. Reddy describes how while kada-catla kotis wear men’s clothes out in public, some dress more femininely or wear women’s clothes for certain parts of the day (Reddy 2006:66) – “kings by day, queens by night” (Reddy 2006:64).
            AC/DCs, or “double-deckers,” are a highly disparaged by the hijra community. Such individuals, rather than solely being a “top” or a “bottom,” switched their sexual role to either be the penetrated or penetrating partner. Such activity was described as “disgusting” by hijras (Reddy 2006:72).
            The last broad gender group in the “traditional” Indian conception of gender, distinct from narans and kotis, are pantis. Like kotis, pantis are male assigned at birth, but unlike them, pantis are seen as “real men” (Reddy 2006:48). Such men are characterized by their “[desire] and [engagement] in sex with women or with kotis” (Reddy 2006:48). While many kotis married women and fathered children, this viewed as mere social obligation and did not affect their view as themselves as kotis (Reddy 2006:48). For hijras specifically, however, any “insinuation of heterosexuality…prior to formal hijra membership was among the worst accusations in the community – one that occasioned…virtual ostracism by other hijras” (Reddy 2006:51-2).
To summarize, in general, besides the paradoxical asexual ideal that is often present, a koti is defined as a person who was male assigned at birth but were “like narans” and desired pantis; while a panti is defined as a person who was male assigned at birth and was a “real man,” characterized by his desire for and sexual engagement with narans and kotis. This conceptualization of gender, then, is very much intertwined with sexuality. Narans, whose sexual anatomy is seen as only allowing them to be in the receptive sexual role, are thus inevitably characterized as desiring and engaging in sex with pantis; lesbians are unimaginable, rendering this a very phallocentric model of gender (Reddy 2006:52). Within the koti gender category itself, gendered roles and behavior are not the only components distinguishing gender subgroups. Non-gendered components such as adopted kinship relations and asexuality are important defining characteristics as well.
These key aspects of this “traditional” “Indian” model of gender and sexuality are in contrast to those of the “modern” “Western” model. Stanford’s health center website outlines a “Glossary of Transgender Terms” that well reflects the particular “modern” “Western” model of gender and sexuality being discussed (Vaden Health Center). Unlike in the “traditional” “Indian” model which strongly intertwines sexuality and gender, gender and sexual orientation are seen as separate, distinct qualities of an individual. Sexual orientation is defined as “A term that describes what people an individual is sexually and/or emotionally attracted to.” In other words, the determining characteristics of sexuality are solely the types of people one is attracted to independent of one’s sexual role as penetrator or penetrated. This creates space for the possibility of conceptualizing female-assigned people who desire and engage in sex other female-assigned people. Lesbianism is thus recognized as a legitimate sexuality under this model. Moreover, while there is certainly a pressure to be only either gay or straight, bisexuality is generally acknowledged as a legitimate sexual orientation as well, demonstrating more flexibility in sexual roles in this model’s conceptualization of sexuality. One’s sexuality is not seen as related to one’s gender; regardless of a person’s gender, a person can be attracted to any particular types of people. Moreover, this model generally conceptualizes people as less strictly confined to one sexual role.
Gender as a distinct quality from sexuality, like gender in the “traditional” “Indian” model, is related to preference for gendered clothes, appearance, and behavior; as well as the type of body one desires. Because gender is not strictly tied to one’s sexual role as penetrator or penetrated, people who are female-assigned are like male-assigned people seen as capable of having multiple genders. People whose gender matches the sex they are assigned at birth are referred to as cisgender. For people who identify as “the opposite sex” as their sex assigned at birth, the term is transgender. Out of frustration for the mainstream gender binary model of only allowing the two options “man” or “woman” whether cis or trans, the terms genderqueer was coined for people who feel they are in between, beyond, or a mixture of man and woman. Some genderqueer people choose to identify as transgender, while others do not. For those genderqueer people who do not identify transgender, the term “trans*” was coined by a progressive segment of the Internet community and is meant to be inclusive all non-cisgender identities (It’s pronounced METROsexual).
IV. Analysis
With these two basic models now outlined, I will problematize the notion that members of the modern-day Indian trans* and queer community conceptualize gender and sexuality through the lens of completely one model or another. Instead, both of these models often have a mixture of influences on an individual. Moreover, members of the modern-day Indian trans* and queer community imagine gender and sexuality in ways that are also influenced by aspects such as class, education, religious conservatism, and nationalism.
An analysis of the opinions Gopi expressed to me throughout our interviews and informal interactions helps demonstrate my argument. As mentioned above, Gopi is the first person in Tamil Nadu to publicly advocate recognition, understanding, and inclusion of non-binary identities. She typically uses modern Western terms to describe these identities; such as genderqueer, androgynous, and agender. However, though she often uses Western terms in referencing non-binary identities, her means of validating these identities are through references to ancient Indian history and mythology. When describing how she came to realize her gender identity as an agender person, Gopi said:
Gopi: Those people help me – Sachi sent me online link, [indistinguishable] and it will kind of say, it will kind of reveal one’s gender what we have.
Jay Pulitano: [laughs] like an online gender quiz?
G: Gender quiz or test…But I don’t believe, I just underwent. And it showed I am a genderqueer person. It showed me that I am an androgynous person. And I started looking back, when I read epics, when I read scriptures, all of the great people, even the gods which we worship, even when I am visiting the temples I used to see male statues – so-called “male” statues – wearing earrings, beautiful ornaments, a dhoti in a very kind of different style – which I prefer – low. It breaks the boundaries of that male-ness and female-ness… Indian culture is originally ridden with legends and mythologies where heroes and heroines have chosen various genders without guilt and their choices being respected and accepted. And ironically, today the Western nations are progressive in researching and educating about gender and sexuality expression. And we, despite our rich cultural heritage of respecting and accepting gender variations, are lagging behind, and even lagging the sensitivity. (March 18, 2014. Interview)

Gopi strongly criticizes the fact that modern Indian LGBT movements do not work with this “theoretical base” (March 18, 2014. Interview) but rather merely “imitate” Western LGBT movements, which are laden with over-emphasis on sex:
Gopi: When Western notions of addressing rights entered India, it was quite – they approached everything in the Western way…They want to imitate the gay rights, act like kissing on the public, and um, having sex in the parks, you know. Holding hands together. It’s not even possible for a heterosexual couples India.
Jay Pulitano: So, if um… If there are Indians who identify as gay, and want to kiss in public, is that a bad thing?
G: [compliments my shirt, sidetracked] Any means of hyper-perversive-ness should be prohibited in India. 52.24
JP: How do you define what perversive-ness is though?
G: Perversive-ness is um, uh, kissing two people in public, it’s not, it’s not up to our culture, we believe. Even though plenty of statues, nude statues, because, see, immediately people will go on saying that, “see, ancient temples had all those sculptures which is nude and having sex.” We got plenty of traditions in India. We have one tradition, left hand[?] tradition we call, tantra, attaining or worshipping god through sex-like pagans[?]. So, um, their tradition was there. But when it comes to, different cultures are here, right? Maybe, [indistinguishable] or Bengal or in Nepal it’s fine, kissing, a male and female kissing in the public. But it’s not okay in Tamil Nadu. It’s not okay in Karnataka…[etc.]…Even between male and female it’s not okay. (March 19, 2014. Interview)

Gopi is thus constructing an emphasis on sex to be a “Western” value as opposed to an “Indian” value. Indeed, sexual reservation can be said to have roots in traditional Indian thought through the philosophy of tapas that hijras use to legitimize their ideal of asexuality. However, as Gopi notes herself, the Indian tradition of tantra – the same philosophy that traditional hijras arguably use to validate their younger stage of life as prostitutes – can conceivably be used to validate the emphasis on sex in modern LGBT movements. Interestingly, Gopi is willing to legitimize certain aspects of the modern Western LGBT movement – its inclusion and acceptance of non-binary identities – as legitimized by Indian cultural heritage, but not others – specifically, the emphasis on sexual freedom. Gopi’s view that sexual liberalism is not “Indian” is likely influenced by her training in a yogic monastery where I know she was taught specific ascetic values such as abstaining from coffee and tea. She presumably may have been taught ascetic values related to sexual activity as well. Although this is only a conjecture, assuming it is true at least to some extent supports the argument that various cultural influences – such as those from religious conservatism and from Western liberalism – can creature mixtures of viewpoints in one’s conceptualization of ideal forms of gender and sexuality.
            Dave’s Queer Activism helps give an interesting perspective on Gopi’s argument that LGBT movements in India should have a strong theoretical basis rooted in Indian cultural heritage. In one chapter of Queer Activism, Dave recounts how when the lesbian movement was first emerging in India, certain middle-class feminists were hesitant to use the word “lesbian” “in the name of cultural authenticity and political expediency” (Dave 2012:35). However, while Dave notes the necessity of criticizing Western hegemony, she also notes, “…women in India, outside of elite, urban activist networks, could and did consider themselves to be lesbian” (Dave 2012:41). One other way of putting this argument is, how can one say being a “lesbian” is not “Indian” if Indians are calling themselves lesbians? In the same vein, can one argue that sexual liberalism is not “Indian” if Indians are becoming sexually liberal? Dave also makes the important point that only those who are urban, middle-class, and educated tend to have access to this argument for cultural authenticity. Class is thus intertwined with this elitist language of cultural heritage.
            While Gopi appears to have an “Indian” conservatism with sexual liberalization, other viewpoints of hers appear to be rooted in the “modern” “Western” model. For example, Gopi criticizes Madhavi for lumping gays and lesbians into the category of transgender. She said, “They don’t even know – I don’t know whether they are not aware that the terms gay and lesbian refer to sexual identity and have nothing to do with gender identity of a person, right?” (March 18, 2014. Interview). Madhavi’s conceptualization of gender and sexuality, however, may be influenced by the traditional hijra imagining of gender which places great importance on sexual roles in determining gender. Gopi’s conceptualization of gender and sexuality is clearly based on a mixture of influences from the “Western” and “traditional” models.
Related to this aspect of imagining gender, one of Sachi’s comments indicated there is diversity within the community as to whether or not sexuality is related to gender. When I asked Sachi if kotis – who were unanimously defined by my participants as “effeminate men” – were considered transgender, for example, she said they “could be.” She added, “Because every individual has his own – or her own – their own expression and identity. I don’t want to label.” (March 14, 2014. Interview). If kotis are primarily defined by their attraction to men – they are “effeminate” but still “men” – the fact that there is a diversity in considering them “transgender” or not implies there is a diversity in imagining the connection between gender and sexuality.  
            Gopi also critiques Madhavi for resisting protests made for educational rights for transwomen “because if transwomen get educated, there will be nobody left for her prostitution business,” she told me informally. I speculate if this second critique is related to comments my participants have made describing regional differences between the transgender communities of the north and south. According to Toya, because of northern religious myths, there is a higher prevalence in northern India that hijras have powers of auspiciousness (March 18, 2014. Interview). I speculate if this comment is connected to Sachi’s statement that the “the thirunangai community in Tamil Nadu is more open than the hijra community of the north in accepting social changes” (March 14, 2014. Interview). Gopi explained in one of our interviews that while the northern community had more respect from the public because of these beliefs in auspiciousness, in Tamil Nadu the community had more legal rights due to the fact that certain transwomen were able to get educated and fight for social change (March 18, 2014. Interview). With Gopi’s accusation of Madhavi in mind, perhaps the north’s greater demand for prostitution contributes to its lower level of legal rights. Class and regional differences thus may be related in the legal rights transwomen have access to. These differences may influence the level of attachment to the “traditional” hijra model in general if these prostitution businesses have an incentive to maintain strict kinship structures.
            Jaya’s opinions are also interesting to observe. Gopi often commended her for including genderqueers and transmen in her politics. I was thus surprised that when I asked her who she was attracted to, she said, “You know.” I laughed and responded, “No I don’t. That’s why I’m asking!” She then asked whom I was attracted to, as if this fact was obvious. When I told her I was attracted to women, she said, “Just like you, I’m attracted to men. I’m a woman, so it’s natural,” implying because I told her I identify as a transman, it was “natural” for me to like women (March 26, 2014. Interview). It is also interesting to note that when I first asked her the question, I asked, “How do you identify in terms of sexual orientation?” but I had to reword the question because she was not familiar with the notion of “sexual orientation.” I thus found it interesting that simultaneous with a “Western” inclusion for transmen and non-binary people was an “Indian” notion that it was “natural” for women to like men, as opposed to a conceptualization of sexuality that is independent of gender.
V. Concluding Remarks
            Overall, this project challenged my assumptions that one’s reality of gender and sexuality is merely based on gender and sexuality. Different social components; such as culture, class, religion, and national; can have drastic effects on these subjective realities. Moreover, as I hope I have demonstrated in this essay, different models of these realities influence and shape one another in fluid ways, rendering a simplified categorization of a gender and sexuality model to be problematic. Like the social forces that influence gender and sexuality, these experiences are fluid, complex, and ever shifting.




Works Cited

Dave, Naisargi N.
2012.  Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics.  Durham: Duke University Press.
It’s pronounced METROsexual.
“What does the asterisk in “trans*” stand for?” Accessed April 11, 2014. http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2012/05/what-does-the-asterisk-in-trans-stand-for/

Reddy, Gayatri.
2006.  With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India.  New Delhi: Yoda.

Revathi, A.
2011.  The Truth About Me: A Hijra Life Story. New Delhi: Penguin India.

Vaden Health Center, Stanford.
“Glossary of Transgender Terms.” Accessed April 11, 2014. https://vaden.stanford.edu/health_library/transgendertermsglossary.html

Bibliography

Mahalingam, Ramaswami.
2003.  Essentialism, Cutlure, and Beliefs About Gender Among the Aravanis of Tamil Nadu, India. In Sex Roles. Vol. 49, No. 9-10, Pp. 489-96.

Montague, Clara.
2012. Police Advocacy, Life Advocacy: The Intersection of Criminality and Transgender Identity in South India. Independent Study Project: South India Term Abroad.

Bakshi, Sandeep.
2010.  A Comparative Analysis of Hijras and Drag Queens: The Subversive Possibilities and Limits of Parading Effeminacy and Negotiating Masculinity. In Journal of Homosexuality. Vol. 46, No. 3-4, Pp. 211-223.




рокாро▓ிройрок் рокாродுроХாрок்рокிрой்рооை - роХேроЯ் рокாро░்рой்ро╕்роЯெроп்рой் ( рооொро┤ிрокெропро░்рок்рокு - ро╕்ро░ீродро░் ро░роЩ்роХро░ாроЬ்)


рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்роХிро▒ рокாродுроХாрок்рокுроХ்роХு ро╡ெро│ிропிро▓் роЗро░ுрок்рокро╡ро░் роОрой்ро▒ு ропாро░ைроХ் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯுро╡ீро░்роХро│்?
рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்роХிро▒ ро╡ிро╖ропрод்родைрок் рокுро▒роХ்роХрогிрок்рокро╡ро░்роХро│். роОрои்родро╡ொро░ு ро╡роЯிро╡ிро▓ுроо் роЙро░ுро╡ிро▓ுроо் родрой் рокாро▓ிройрод்родைрок்рокுро▒роХ்роХрогிрок்рокро╡ро░்роХро│், ‘роТро░ு роЖрог் роЗродைроЪ் роЪெроп்ропроХ்роХூроЯாродு; роТро░ு рокெрог் роЕродைроЪ் роЪெроп்ропроХ்роХூроЯாродு’ роОрой்ро▒ு роЗро░ு рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுроо் ро╡ிродிроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│родை рооீро▒ுрокро╡ро░்роХро│்родாрой் роЕро╡ро░்роХро│். роЙрог்рооைропிро▓் рокро▓்ро╡ேро▒ு роиாроХро░ிроХроЩ்роХро│ிро▓் роЗро░рог்роЯுроХ்роХுроо் рооேро▒்рокроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│் роЗро░ுрои்родுро│்ро│рой. роЖройாро▓் рооுродрой்рооைрок் рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ாроХроХ் роХро▓ாроЪாро░роо் роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ்роХொрог்роЯродிро▓் роЪேро░ாродро╡ро░்роХро│், родроЩ்роХро│ைрод் родாро┤்ро╡ு роиிро▓ைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЕроХро▒்ро▒ிроХ் роХொро│்ро│роЪ் роЪрооூроХрок் рокாро▓ிройрок் рокாродுроХாрок்рокிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒ுроХிро▒ாро░்роХро│். роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЗропро▒்роХைропிрой் ро╡ிродிроХро│ோроЯு рооுро░рог்рокроЯுроХிро▒ீро░்роХро│். роЕродுро╡ே роЙроЩ்роХро│ைрок் рокாродுроХாрок்рокிрой்рооைроХ்роХுро│் родро│்ро│ுроХிро▒родு.

роЙроЩ்роХро│் рокுрод்родроХрод்родிро▓் роЪрооூроХрод்родிрой் роЙро▒ுродிропாрой рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│ைрод் родроХро░்род்родெро▒ிрои்родாро▓் роороЯ்роЯுрооே роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் рооுро┤ுрооைропை роЙрогро░ рооுроЯிропுроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роОро┤ுродிропிро░ுрои்родீро░்роХро│். роПрой் роТро░ு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройрод்родைроЪ் роЪாро░்рои்родிро░ுрок்рокродு роироо்рооைрок் рокிрогைрод்родு ро╡ைрод்родிро░ுроХ்роХுроо் роОрой்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்?

рокிрогைрок்рокு роОрой்рокродு роЙроЩ்роХро│ை роироХро░ ро╡ிроЯாрооро▓் ро╡ைрод்родிро░ுрок்рокродு. роЗро╡்ро╡ாро▒ு роТро░ு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ роЗроЯрод்родுроХ்роХுро│் роЗропроЩ்роХாрод,роЕро▓்ро▓родு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│ ро╡ро┤ிрооுро▒ைроХро│ிро▓் роЗропроЩ்роХாрод роТрой்ро▒ை роОро╡்ро╡ாро▒ு роЕроЯைропாро│рок்рокроЯுрод்родுро╡родு? роироо் рокிроЯிроХ்роХுро│் ро╡ро░ாрод, роироо் роОро▓்ро▓ைроХ்роХுро│் роЗро▓்ро▓ாрод роТрой்ро▒ு роироо் рооுро┤ுрооைропைрок் рокாродிроХ்роХிро▒родு. рокெрог்рогிроп роЗропроХ்роХроЩ்роХро│், рокெрог் роОрой்ро▒ роЕроЯைропாро│род்родிрой் рооூро▓роо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் рооுро┤ு ро╡ீроЪ்роЪு роОро╡்ро╡ாро▒ு роХроЯ்роЯுроХ்роХுро│் ро╡ைроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│родு, роОрой்рокродை роЙрогро░்рои்родுро│்ро│рой. роЕродு рокோро▓ро╡ே роЖрог்роХро│ிрой் роЕрооைрок்рокுроо். роЖройாро▓் ро╡ெроХு роЪிро▓ро░ே роЖрог்роХро│ுроо், рокெрог்роХро│ுроо் роороЯ்роЯுрооே роЙро│்ро│ роТро░ு роЪрооூроХроо் роОро╡்ро╡ாро▒ு родроо்рооைроХ் роХроЯ்роЯுроХ்роХுро│் ро╡ைрод்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு роОрой்рокродை роЙрогро░்рои்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│்.

роЙроЩ்роХро│் рооொро┤ிропிро▓் ‘ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை’ роОрой்рокродு роОрой்рой?

роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்родро╡ро░ைропிро▓் ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роОрой்рокродு роЖрокрод்родிро▓்ро▓ாрод ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроЯுрод்родுро╡родே роОрой்рокேрой். роЗро╡்ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│் роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│ோроЯு рокிрогைроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│родு. роЗро╡் роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│் роЪрооூроХрод்родாро▓் ро╡ро┤роЩ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯро╡ை. роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ ро╡ропродு ро╡ро░ை ‘роиாрой் роЯேро╡ி роХ்ро░ாроХ்роХெроЯ் роЖроХ ро╡ிро░ுроо்рокுроХிро▒ேрой்’ роОрой்ро▒ோ ‘роиாрой் роЗро│ро╡ро░роЪி роЯропாройாро╡ாроХ ро╡ிро░ுроо்рокுроХிро▒ேрой்’ роОрой்ро▒ோ роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЪொро▓்ро▓ிроХ் роХொро│்ро│ро▓ாроо். ро╡ро│ро░்рои்родрокிрой் роЕродைроЪ் роЪொро▓்ро▓ роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роЕройுроородிропிро▓்ро▓ை.роЖройாро▓் роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்родро╡ро░ைропிро▓் роЪாроХுроо் ро╡ро░ை роиாрой் роХுро┤рои்родைродாрой். роОройро╡ே  ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роОрой்рокродு роЖрокрод்родிро▓்ро▓ாрод роОрой் ро╡ாро┤்роХ்роХை ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிропிроЯுро╡родுродாрой்.

роЪிро▓ро░் роЪொро▓்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│் рокாро▓ிройрод்родுроЯройாрой роЪுродрои்родிро░ роЙро▒ро╡ு рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் рокாро▓ிрой роЗро░ுрооைропிрой் рооூро▓роо் рооройிродройிрой் рокрог்рокுроХро│ைропுроо் ,родிро▒рооைроХро│ைропுроо், рокроЩ்роХро│ிрок்рокைропுроо் рооுро┤ுро╡родுроо் роЙрогро░ рооுроЯிропுроо் роОрой்ро▒ு. роЗрой்ройுроо் роЪிро▓ро░் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роОрой்рокродு роЖрогாроХро╡ோ роЕро▓்ро▓родு рокெрог்рогாроХро╡ோ роЗро░ுрок்рокродிрой் роЕройுрокро╡роо் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் родроЩ்роХро│் рокாро▓ிройрод் родрой்рооைропிрой் ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроЯுрод்родுродро▓் роОрой்рокродுродாрой் роОрой்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│். роЗрои்род роЗро░ு ро╡ேро▒ுрокроЯ்роЯ роХро░ுрод்родுроХро│ிро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│் роиிро▓ை роОрой்рой?

роиாрой் роЗро╡்ро╡ிро░рог்роЯிро▓ுроо் роОрои்род ро╡ேро▒ுрокாроЯுроо் роЗро░ுрок்рокродாроХ роиிройைроХ்роХро╡ிро▓்ро▓ை. роЕро╡ை рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ைроХ்роХாрой рокроЯிроХро│் роОрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро╡ேрой். рооுродро▒்рокроЯி роиீроЩ்роХро│் роОрой்ройро╡ாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ோ роЕродுро╡ாроХ, рооுро┤ுрооைропாроХ роЗро░ுрок்рокродு. роЕродாро╡родு роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЖрогோ роЕро▓்ро▓родு рокெрог்рогோ роЕродிро▓் рооுро┤ுрооைропாроХ роЗро░ுроЩ்роХро│். роЕродுродாрой் роЪுро▓рокрооாрой рооுродро▒்рокроЯி. роЕродு роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрок் рокோродро╡ிро▓்ро▓ைропெройிро▓் роЗро░рог்роЯாроо் рокроЯி, рооுро┤ுро╡родுроо் роЙрогро░்ро╡ு рооропрооாройродுроо், роЗро░ுрооைропாроп் роЗро░ுрок்рокродுроо். роЗрои்роиிро▓ைропிро▓்родாрой் роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓் роЖрогுроХ்роХுроо் рокெрог்рогுроХ்роХுроо் роЗроЯைропிро▓் роЙро│்ро│ роиிро▓ை  роОрой்рокродு роОрой்рой? роОрой்ро▒ு роХேроЯ்роХ рооுроЯிропுроо். роЗрои்роиிро▓ை роЙроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிропிроЯ роЙродро╡ுроХிро▒родா?роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓் роЗро╡்ро╡ிро░ுрооை роиிро▓ைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроЯைроп роЕроЯைропாро│род்родை роПро▒்рокроЯுрод்родிроХ் роХொро│்ро│ рооுроЯிропுрооா? роОрой рооுропро▒்роЪிрод்родுрок் рокாро░ுроЩ்роХро│். рооுроЯிропро╡ிро▓்ро▓ைропா! роЗрок்рокோродு роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு рооூрой்ро▒ாро╡родாроХ роТро░ு ро╡ிро╖ропроо் родேро╡ைрок்рокроЯுроХிро▒родு. роЕродு роЗро╡்ро╡ிро░ுрооை роиிро▓ைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிро╡ро░ுро╡родு, роЗро░ு роОродிро░் родுро░ுро╡роЩ்роХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родுроо் ро╡ேро▒ுрокроЯுро╡родு. роЖрог்роЯ்ро░ோ рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роХைройி (роЖрог்рооை, рокெрог்рооை) роОройுроо் роЗро░ு рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роЗроЯைропே роЙро│்ро│ роЗроЯைро╡ெро│ிропிройைроЪ் роЪுро▒்ро▒ிрок் рокாро░ுроЩ்роХро│். роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓் роЕрои்род роЗроЯрод்родிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроЯுрод்род рооுроЯிроХிро▒родா роОрой்ро▒ு рокாро░ுроЩ்роХро│்.

роОройро╡ே роиீроЩ்роХро│் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ роЕро╡்ро╡ிро░рог்роЯுроо் рооுро░рог்роХро│் роОрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро▓рооாроЯ்роЯேрой். роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்родро╡ро░ைропிро▓் роЕро╡ை рокроЯிроиிро▓ைроХро│்родாроо். родேро╡ை роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЙроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроЯுрод்родுро╡родு, роЗродிро▓் рокாро▓ிройроо் роТро░ு родроЯைропро▓்ро▓. роЕродுро╡ுроо் рокோродро╡ிро▓்ро▓ைропா? роЗройроо், ро╡ропродு, ро╡роХுрок்рокு роОрой рооுропрой்ро▒ு рокாро░ுроЩ்роХро│். роиாрой் рооுродро▓ிро▓் роТро░ு роЖрогாроХро╡ுроо், рокிрой் роЗро░ுрооை роиிро▓ைропிро▓ுроо், рокிрой்рокு рокெрог்рогாроХро╡ுроо், рооீрог்роЯுроо் роЪро▒்ро▒ு рооேроо்рокроЯ்роЯ роЖрогாроХро╡ுроо் рооுропро▒்роЪிрод்родுрок் рокாро░்род்родு ро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой். родро▒்рокோродு роиாрой் роЖрогுрооிро▓்ро▓ை, рокெрог்рогுрооிро▓்ро▓ை. роЕродைрод் родாрог்роЯிроп рооூрой்ро▒ாроо் роиிро▓ைропிро▓் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой் роЗрок்рокோродு роиாрой் роЖрог், рокெрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роЕройைрод்родுрок் рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роХро▓ро╡ை.

роЖрой்рооீроХроХ் роХрог்рогோроЯ்роЯрод்родிро▓் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ேро▒ுрокாроЯுроХро│ுроХ்роХு роОрои்род роЕро│ро╡ுроХ்роХு рооுроХ்роХிропрод்родுро╡роо் роХொроЯுроХ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுрооெрой்роХிро▒ ро╡ро░ைропро▒ை роЗро░ுрок்рокродாроХ роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா?

роиாрой் роЗрои்род роХிро░роХрод்родிро▓ிро░ுроХ்роХுроо் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ро░ைропро▒ைроХро│் роОройроХ்роХு роЙродро╡ாродு роОрой்ройுроо் роиிро▓ைроХ்роХு ро╡рои்родு ро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой். роЕродைрок் рокுро░ிрои்родுроХொрог்роЯு роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ்роХொрог்роЯு ро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой். роОройроХ்роХாрой роТро░ு роЙро▓роХрод்родை роЕрооைрод்родுроХ் роХொрог்роЯு ро╡ாро┤род்родொроЯроЩ்роХி ро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой். роЖрогாроХро╡ோ рокெрог்рогாроХро╡ோ роЗро░ுрои்родு рокாро░்род்родாропிро▒்ро▒ு. роЗро╡்ро╡ுро▓роХிрой் роОрои்родро╡ொро░ு роХро▓ாроЪாро░рооுроо் роЗродைрод் родро╡ிро░ ро╡ேро▒ு роТро░ு рокாро▓ிройрод்родை роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ் роХொро│்ро│рок்рокோро╡родிро▓்ро▓ை. рокிрой் роОродро▒்роХாроХ роорог்роЯைропை роЙроЯைрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо். ро▓ாро╡ோроЯ்ро╕ு роЪொрой்ройродு рокோро▓ “родுро╡рои்родுро╡рооாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо் рооுро▒ைроХро│ிро▓் роЗро░ுрои்родு ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை рокெро▒ுрооுрой் роиீроЩ்роХро│் рооுродро▓ிро▓் роЕродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிропிро▓் роЗро░ுроХ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо்”. роЗро░рог்роЯு ро╡ாроп்рок்рокுроХро│் роороЯ்роЯுрооே родро░роХ் роХூроЯிроп роТро░ு роХро▓ாроЪாро░род்родிройை роОрой்ройாро▓் ро╡ро┤ிрооொро┤ிроп рооுроЯிропாродு. рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродு роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЕроЯைропாро│роо் роОрой்рокродை рооро▒ுроХ்роХ роЗропро▓ாродு. роЕродே роиேро░род்родிро▓் роЕродு роТро░ுро╡ро░ாро▓ுроо் роЖро░ாропрок்рокроЯாродродாроХро╡ுроо் роЙро│்ро│родு. роЕро╡்ро╡ுрогро░்ро╡ு ро╡ெро▒ுроо் родாройிропроЩ்роХி.

рокாро▓ிройрод்родிро▒்роХுроо், рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒ுрокாроЯ்роЯுроХ்роХுроо் роЙро│்ро│ родொроЯро░்рокு роОрой்рой роОрой்ро▒ு роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்?

роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்родро╡ро░ைропிро▓் роЗро░ுрооை роОрой்ро▒ родாро┤்ро╡ு роиிро▓ைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு рокாро▓ிройрод்родை рокрой்рооைроХ்роХு роЙропро░்род்родுро╡родே роЖроХுроо். роЕродுродாрой் роЗрой்ро▒ைроХ்роХு роЕроиேроХ роХро▓ாроЪாро░роЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрод் родேро╡ைрок்рокроЯுро╡родு.

рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ேро▒ுрокாроЯுроХро│ை роЖрог் роЕро▓்ро▓родு рокெрог் роОрой்роХிро▒ роЙроЯро▓ிро▓் роЗро░ுрои்родு роХொрог்роЯு родாрог்роЯிроЪ் роЪெро▓்ро▓ рооுроЯிропுроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா?

роиிроЪ்роЪропрооாроХ роЗро▓்ро▓ை. роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЙроЯро▓் роЖрогா роЕро▓்ро▓родு рокெрог்рогா? ропாро░ுроЯைроп родீро░்рооாройроо் роЕродு? роОрой்ройுроЯைроп роЙроЯро▓் роЖрогா? рокெрог்рогா? роЖрогுроЯро▓் роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் роОрой்рой? рокெрог்рогுроЯро▓் роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் роОрой்рой? роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЕродро▒்роХாрой ро╡ிро│роХ்роХрооாроХрод் родро░ுроо் ро╡ாро░்род்родைроХро│் рооிроХроХ் роХройрооாройро╡ை. роЪро░ிропாроХ роЗродுродாрой் роЖрогுроЯро▓் роЗродுродாрой் рокெрог்рогுроЯро▓் роОрой்ро▒ு роиீроЩ்роХро│் ро╡ிро│роХ்роХுроо் ро╡ро░ை роЗродро▒்роХாрой рокродிро▓ைроЪ் роЪொро▓்ро╡родு роЪிро░роороо். роОройроХ்роХு роЕрок்рокроЯிропெрой்ро▒ாро▓் роОрой்ройро╡ெрой்ро▒ே родெро░ிропாродு. роЗрои்родроХ் роХேро│்ро╡ிроХ்роХு роЕроиேроХрооாрой рокродிро▓்роХро│ை ро╡ைрод்родிро░ுроХ்роХுроо் роЕроиேроХроо் рокேро░ைрод் родெро░ிропுроо், роиீроЩ்роХро│் роОрой்рой роЪொро▓்ро╡ீро░்роХро│் роОрой்ро▒ு роОройроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிропாродு. роЪொро▓்ро▓ுроЩ்роХро│் роЖрогுроЯро▓் роОрой்рокродு роОрой்рой?

роОройроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிрои்родро╡ро░ை XX рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் XY роХுро░ோрооோроЪோроо்роХро│்родாрой் роЕро╡ை.
роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЙроЩ்роХро│் роХ்ро░ோрооோроЪோрооைрок் рокро░ிроЪோродிрод்родродுрог்роЯா?

роОройроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிрои்родро╡ро░ை роЗро▓்ро▓ை.
рокிрой் роОрок்рокроЯி роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிропுроо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроЯைропродு роЖрогுроЯро▓ா рокெрог்рогுроЯро▓ா роОрой்ро▒ு? роЙрог்рооைропிро▓் роХ்ро░ோрооோроЪோроо்роХро│ிро▓் рокродிроиாрой்роХு роЪாрод்родிропроХ் роХூро▒ுроХро│் роЙро│்ро│рой. XX, XY, XXY, YYX, XO, XXX, XOX. . . . роОрой்ро▒ு. роЖройாро▓் роЙрог்рооைропிро▓் роЕрод்родройை рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родா роОрой்рой? роЖроХ рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродு роХ்ро░ோрооோроЪோроо் роЕроЯிрок்рокроЯைропிро▓் роЗро▓்ро▓ை.

роЖройாро▓் роироо் роЙроЯро▓ுроХ்роХு роЗро░рог்роЯாроо் роиிро▓ைрок் рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│் роЙро│்ро│ройро╡ே, рооாро░்рокроХроЩ்роХро│், рооுроХрод்родிро▓் ро╡ро│ро░ுроо் рооுроЯி рокோрой்ро▒ро╡ை. рооேро▓ுроо் роиாроо் роироо்рооை роТро░ு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройрооாроХрод்родாрой் роЕроЯைропாро│рок்рокроЯுрод்родிроХ் роХொро│்роХிро▒ோроо், роироо் роЙроЯை рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் родро▓ைропро▓роЩ்роХாро░роо் рооூро▓рооாроХ. роиாрой் роХேроЯ்роХ ро╡ிро░ுроо்рокுро╡родு роЖрогெрой்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог்рогெрой்ро▒ுроо் роЕроЯைропாро│рок்рокроЯுрод்родрок்рокроЯுроо் роЙроЯро▓ிро▓் ро╡ாро┤்рои்родு роХொрог்роЯு роЗродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு родрок்рокிроХ்роХ рооுропро▒்роЪிрок்рокродрой் роЪாрод்родிропроХ்роХூро▒ுроХро│் рокро▒்ро▒ி?

роиிро▒ைропрок்рокேро░் роОройроХ்роХுрок் рокெрог்рогுроЯро▓் роЗро░ுрок்рокродாроХрод்родாрой் роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│். роЖройாро▓் роЕродை рооுродро▓ிро▓் рооро▒ுрок்рокродு роиாрой்родாрой். роОройроХ்роХு роЖрог்роХுро▒ி роЙрог்роЯா роОройிро▓், роЖроо் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு. роЖройாро▓் роЙро│்ро│ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроХ்роХрооாроХрод் родிро░ுрок்рокрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│родு. роЗро░ுрок்рокிройுроо் роЕродு роЖрогுро▒ுрок்рокுродாрой். роОройроХ்роХுрок் рокெрог்рогுро▒ுрок்рокு роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родா? роЗро▓்ро▓ை. роЖройாро▓் рокாро▓ிрой роЙро▒ுрок்рокு ро╡роХைрок்рокாроЯ்роЯிропро▓ிрой்рокроЯிрок் рокாро░்род்родாро▓் роОройроХ்роХிро░ுрок்рокродு роЙро│்ро╡ாроЩ்роХிроп роЕрооைрок்рокு, ро╡ெро│ிроиீрог்роЯ роЕрооைрок்рокро▓்ро▓. роЕродுрокோрой்ро▒ு роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓் рооாро░்рокроХроЩ்роХро│ோроЯு роТро░ு роЖрогைрок் рокாро░்род்родிро░ுроХ்роХ рооுроЯிропாродு. роиாрой் роОрой்ройை ро╡ிроЯрок் рокெро░ிроп рооாро░்рокроХроЩ்роХро│ோроЯு роЖрогைрок் рокாро░்род்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой். роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЖроЯைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு рооாро░்рокроХроЩ்роХро│் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родா роОрой்рокродு родெро░ிропாродு. родொрок்рокி ро╡ைрод்родிро░ுрои்родாро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│் родро▓ைрооுроЯி роОрок்рокроЯிропிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு роОрой்ро▒ு родெро░ிрои்родு роХொро│்ро│ рооுроЯிропாродு. роОройро╡ே ро╡ெро│ிрод் родோро▒்ро▒род்родிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роиீроЩ்роХро│் ропாро░ெрой்ро▒ு родெро░ிрои்родு роХொро│்ро│ рооுроЯிропாродு.роОройро╡ே роЕродு родро▓ை рооுроЯிропோ рооாро░்рокроХроЩ்роХро│ோ роЕро▓்ро▓. роЕрок்рокроЯிропெрой்ро▒ாро▓் ро╣ாро░்рооோрой்роХро│ா? роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிрои்родிро░ுроХ்роХுроо் роЯெро╕்роЯோро╕்роЯீро░ாрой் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роОро╕்роЯ்ро░ோроЬрой், роЕро╡ைродாрой் роОро▓்ро▓ாроо் роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓் рокாро▓ிройрод்родை рооро░ுрои்родுроХ் роХроЯைроХро│ிро▓் ро╡ாроЩ்роХ рооுроЯிропுроо். роОройро╡ே роЖрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог் роОрой்рокродு роЪாро░்рои்род роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ுроХ்роХு роЪро░ிропாрой ро╡ிро│роХ்роХроо் роЗро▓்ро▓ாрооро▓் роОрой்ройாро▓் рокродிро▓் роЪொро▓்ро▓ рооுроЯிропாродு.

рокாро▓ிройрод்родிрой் роОрод்родроХைроп роХூро▒ுроХро│ை роЙропிро░ிропро▓் роЪாро░்рои்родродு рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் родройிрод்родுро╡рооாройродு роОрой்ро▒ு рокிро░ிрок்рокீро░்роХро│்? роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிрои்род рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒்ро▒ு роЕро▒ுро╡ைроЪிроХிроЪ்роЪை роЪெроп்родு роХொрог்роЯро╡ро░்роХро│் роЕро▓்ро▓родு ро╣ாро░்рооோрой் роЪிроХிроЪ்роЪை роЪெроп்родு роХொрог்роЯро╡ро░்роХро│் роЕрок்рокாро░்ро╡ைропை рооாро▒்ро▒ிропродுрог்роЯா?

роЕродு роЪுро▓рокроо். роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்род ро╡ро░ை роЕро│ро╡ிроЯроХ்роХூроЯிроп роОро▓்ро▓ாрооுроо் роЙропிро░ிропро▓் роЪாро░்рои்родродு. рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ை роЕройைрод்родுроо் роЕроХро╡ропрооாройродு, родройிрод்родுро╡рооாройродு. рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│், ро╣ாро░்рооோрой், роХ்ро░ோрооோроЪோроо் рооро▒்ро▒ роХேроЯ்роХுроо், рокாро░்роХ்роХுроо், роиுроХро░ுроо், родொроЯுроо், роЕро│ро╡ிроЯроХ்роХூроЯிроп роЕройைрод்родுроо் роЙропிро░ிропро▓் роЪாро░்рои்родродே. роЖройாро▓் ‘роиாрой் роЗрои்род роЖроЯைропை роЕрогிроп ро╡ிро░ுроо்рокுроХிро▒ேрой்’ роОрой்рокродு родройிрод்родுро╡рооாройродு.

роЙро│ро╡ிропро▓் роЪாро░்рои்род, роЙрогро░்ро╡ு роЪாро░்рои்род роЕро▓்ро▓родு роироЯрод்родை роЪாро░்рои்род роОродைропேройுроо் роЙропிро░ிропро▓் роЪாро░்рои்родு рокாро░்роХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா? роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕро╡ை роХро▓ாроЪாро░роо் роЪாро░்рои்родродு роОрой்рокீро░்роХро│ா?
роЗрои்род роЙро░ைропாроЯро▓ை роТро░ு роиிрооிроЯроо் рокிрой்ройோроХ்роХிроЪ் роЪெро▓ுрод்родро▓ாроо்,роЗро▓்ро▓ைропெройிро▓் роЗродே роЗроЯрод்родிро▓் роЕродு рооாроЯ்роЯிроХ் роХொрог்роЯிро░ுроХ்роХுроо். роиீроЩ்роХро│் рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роХுро▒ிроХ்роХுроо்рокோродு роЖрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог் роОрой்ро▒ுродாрой் рооро▒ைрооுроХрооாроХроХ் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯுроХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா?

роЖрооாроо்.
роЕрок்рокроЯிропாройாро▓் роОройроХ்роХு роЕродு роЪிро░роорооாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо். роЗрок்рокроЯி ро╡ைрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ро▓ாроо். рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்ро▒ு рокேроЪுроо்рокோродு роЗройி роЪிро▒ுро╡рой், роЪிро▒ுрооி, роЖрог், рокெрог், роЖрогிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு рокெрог்рогாройро╡ро░், рокெрог்рогிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЖрогாройро╡ро░் роОрой்ро▒ு роЖро▒ு рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ைроХ் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯுро╡родாроХроХ் роХொро│்ро╡ோроо்.
роЪро░ி, роЗрок்рокோродு роОрой்ройிро▓் роиாройே рооுро░рог்рокроЯ்роЯுроХ் роХொро│்роХிро▒ேрой். роЯெро╕்роЯோро╕்роЯீро░ாрой் роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роЖрог் родрой்рооைропை, роХோрокрод்родைроХ் роХொроЯுроХ்роХுроо். роОро╕்роЯ்ро░ோроЬрой் рооройிродро░ிрой் рокாро▓ிрой роИро░்рок்рокை рооாро▒்ро▒ிропрооைроХ்роХроХ் роХூроЯிропродு, роОройроХ்роХு роЕродு роироЯрои்родுро│்ро│родு. роЖройாро▓் роОро╕்роЯ்ро░ோроЬройுроо் роЯெро╕்роЯோро╕்роЯீро░ாройுроо் рооுро▒ைропே роЖрог் рокெрог் роОрой்ро▒ு ропாро░் роЪொрой்ройродு? роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЙроЯро▓ிро▓் роЙро│்ро│ XY роХ்ро░ோрооோроЪோроо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ роироЯрод்родைропை-

рокுро░ிроХிро▒родு, роЪிро▓ роироЯрод்родைроХро│் роЙроЯро▒்роХூро▒ு роЪாро░்рои்родродு роЕродை роиாроо்родாрой் роЖрогெрой்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог்рогெрой்ро▒ுроо் рокிро░ிрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்роХிро▒ோроо் роОрой்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்.

рооிроХроЪ்роЪро░ி. роЗро▓்ро▓ைропெройிро▓் роЕродு роЕро░்род்родрооро▒்ро▒родாроХிро╡ிроЯுроо்.  роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роЯெро╕்роЯோро╕்роЯீро░ாрой் роХொроЯுрод்родாро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│் рооுроХрод்родிро▓் рооுроЯி ро╡ро│ро░ро▓ாроо், роЕродройாро▓் роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЖрогாроХி ро╡ிроЯுро╡ீро░்роХро│ா? роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுрод் родெро░ிропுрооா? родொроЯро░்рои்родு роЯெро╕்роЯோро╕்роЯீро░ாрой் роХொроЯுроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯாро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роХ்ро│ிроЯோро░ிро╕் рооூрой்ро▒ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роиாрой்роХு роЕроЩ்роХுро▓роо் ро╡ро░ை ро╡ро│ро░ுроо். роЕродு рокாро░்роХ்роХ роОрок்рокроЯிропிро░ுроХ்роХுроо்? роЕродை роиீроЩ்роХро│் рокெрог்рогுроЯро▓் роОрой்рокீро░்роХро│ா? роЗродு рокோрой்ро▒ ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ி роиிройைроХ்роХைропிро▓் роЪிро░ிрок்рокродே роЮாройрод்родிрой் роЕроЯைропாро│роо் роОрой்рокேрой், роЕродрой் рокிрой் роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЕроЯிрок்рокроЯைрок் рокாро▓ிройроХ் роХொро│்роХைропெрой்рокродு роЗродு роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродு роОрой்рокродройாро▓் роХроЯ்роЯрооைроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯு роЗро░ுроХ்роХாродு. роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роЪிро▓ роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ைрок் рокுро░ிрои்родுроХொро│்ро│ роиாрой் роЪிро░роорок்рокроЯுроХிро▒ேрой் роПройெройிро▓் роЕро╡ை роЗродு роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродு роОрой்ро▒ роХро░ுрод்родை роЙроЯைропройро╡ாропிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு.

роЙроЩ்роХро│் ‘рокாро▓ிройрок் рокாродுроХாрок்рокிрой்рооை’ропிро▓் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роОрой்рокродு  роЪுродрои்родிро░рооாроХ ро╡ேро▒ுрокроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுро│் рооாро▒ுро╡родு роОрой்ро▒ு роХூро▒ிройீро░்роХро│்.
рокро▓родро░рок்рокроЯ்роЯро╡ро▒்ро▒ுроХ்роХுро│்.

роЖройாро▓் роЗродிро▓் рооро▒்ро▒ொро░ு роиோроХ்роХுрооிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு, роЕродைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ி роЙроЩ்роХро│ிроЯроо் роХேроЯ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо். роЖрой்рооீроХрок் рокропிро▒்роЪிропро│ிроХ்роХுроо் рокெро░ுроо்рокாро▓ாройோро░் роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│் роЕрод்родройைропுроо் родுро▒рок்рокродு роОрой்рокродிро▓் рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│род்родைропுроо் роЪேро░்род்родுроХ் роХொро│்роХிрой்ро▒ройро░். роЖройாро▓் рокாро▓ிройрод்родைроЪ் роЪாро░்рои்родிро░ுрок்рокродுроо் роЕро▓்ро▓родு ро╡ிро▓роХிропிро░ுрок்рокродுроо் роХூроЯ роЙроЩ்роХро│் роЖрой்рооீроХ рооுрой்ройேро▒்ро▒род்родுроХ்роХுрод் родроЯைропாроХро▓ாрооிро▓்ро▓ைропா? роЕродாро╡родு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройроо், рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒ுрокாроЯு роЕро▓்ро▓родு рокாро▓ிройрооே роЗро▓்ро▓ை роОрой்ро▒ родрод்родுро╡род்родைроЪ் роЪாро░்рои்родிро░ுрок்рокродாро▓்?
роЖроо். роЕрок்рокроЯிроЪ் роЪாро░்рои்родிро░ுрои்родாро▓் роЕродு роиிроЪ்роЪропроо் роТро░ு родроЯைропாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо்.

роЗродு роТро░ு роиுроЯ்рокрооாрой роХேро│்ро╡ி. родрой்ройிроЯрод்родிро▓் роЙро│்ро│ рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│ைропுроо், родрой்ройைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ிроп роЪுропрокிроо்рокрод்родைропுроо் родுро▒рок்рокродрой் роЪாрод்родிропроХ்роХூро▒ு рокро▒்ро▒ிроХ் роХேроЯ்роХிро▒ேрой், роЕро╡ро▒்ро▒ைрод் родுро▒рои்родு ро╡ிроЯுро╡родுроо் рокிрой் роТро╡்ро╡ொро░ு роХрогрод்родிро▓ுроо் роЗропро▒்роХைропாроХро╡ுроо், родிроЯீро░ெрой்ро▒ுроо் роПро▒்рокроЯுроо் роЕродை роЙрогро░்ро╡родுроо், роЕродே роЪрооропрод்родிро▓் рокாро▓ிройрод்родுроХ்роХாрой родрой்рооை рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роЪுрокாро╡роЩ்роХро│ை рооро▒ுроХ்роХாрооро▓ுроо் роТродுроХ்роХிро╡ிроЯாрооро▓ுроо்,  роТро┤ுроЩ்роХுрокроЯுрод்родாрооро▓ுроо், роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродு роЪாро░்рои்род рооுрой்рооுроЯிро╡ுроХро│ோроЯு роЗро░ுрок்рокродைрод் родро╡ிро░்рок்рокродுроо் роЪாрод்родிропрооா?

роиீроЩ்роХро│் роХேроЯ்рокродு роТро░ு роЙропро░்рои்род роиிро▓ை. роОройроХ்роХு роЕродு роЪாрод்родிропроо். роПройெройிро▓் роОрой் ро╡ாро┤்роХ்роХை рооுро┤ுродுроо் роЕродைрод்родாрой் роЪெроп்родு роХொрог்роЯிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой், роиாро▒்рокродு ро╡ро░ுроЯроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுроо் рооேро▓ாроХ роЗродைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ிроХ் роХро╡ройрооாроХ роЖро░ாроп்рои்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой். роиாрой் роЕро▒ிрои்родро╡ро▒்ро▒ை роОрой் ро╡ாро┤்роХ்роХைропிрой் рооро▒்ро▒ рокроХுродிроХро│ுроХ்роХுрок் рокропрой்рокроЯுрод்родுроХிро▒ேрой்.

рокாро▓ிройрок் рокாродுроХாрок்рокிрой்рооைропிро▓் роиீроЩ்роХро│் ро╡ிро╡ро░ிрод்родродு рокோро▓ рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒்ро▒роо் роЕроЯைрои்родро╡ро░்роХро│ிро▓் рокெро░ுроо்рокாро▓ாройோро░் ро╡ேро▒ுрокроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிро▓் рооாро▒ி рооாро▒ி роЗро░ுрок்рокродைрок் рокாро░்роХ்роХைропிро▓், роТро░ு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ рокாро▓ிройрод்родுроХ்роХுро│் роЪிроХ்роХிро╡ிроЯாродு, родேро░்рои்родெроЯுроХ்роХроХ் роХிроЯைроХ்роХுроо் роЕрод்родройை роЪாрод்родிропроХ் роХூро▒ுроХро│ைропுроо் ро╡ாро┤்рои்родு рокாро░்рок்рокродு родெро░ிроХிро▒родு. роиாрой் роЗродைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ிроп роЪிрои்родройை роОро╡்ро╡ாро▒ு роПро▒்рокроЯ்роЯродு роОрой்рокродைроХ் роХேроЯ்роХ ро╡ிро░ுроо்рокுроХிро▒ேрой்.

роЗро▓்ро▓ை, роЗродை роЕройைро╡ро░ுрооே роЪெроп்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│், роиாроЩ்роХро│் роороЯ்роЯுрооро▓்ро▓. роЗродிро▓் роиாроЩ்роХро│் роОрои்род роЕро│ро╡ுроХ்роХுроЪ் роЪுропро╡ுрогро░்ро╡ோроЯு роИроЯுрокроЯுроХிро▒ோроо் роОрой்рокродுродாрой் ро╡ேро▒ுрокроЯுроХிро▒родு.

роЙрог்рооைродாрой். роЗрои்родрок்рокாрод்родிро░роЩ்роХро│ை роПро▒்рокро╡ро░்роХро│ுроо் родроо் рокாро▓ிройрод்родிро▒்роХாрой роЪுроп роЙрогро░்ро╡ோроЯுроо் рооிроХைропாроХро╡ுроо்родாрой் роироЯிроХ்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│். роЕродு роЗрок்рокроЯிрок்рокроЯ்роЯро╡ро░்роХро│ைрок் рокாродிроХ்роХுроо். роЖройாро▓் роЗро░ுрокாро▓ிрой роЖрог்роХро│ுроо், рокெрог்роХро│ுроо் роТрок்рокுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ுроо் роЕро│ро╡ிро▓் роЗродைроЪ் роЪெроп்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│்.
роиாрой் роЬாрой் ро╡ேроп்рой், рооро░்ро▓ிрой் роорой்ро▒ோ, рок்ро░ூро╕் ро╡ிро▓்ро▓ிро╕், роЬீройா роЯேро╡ிро╕் роЖроХிропோро░ைроХ் роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ роЗро░ுрои்родேрой்.


роЪро░ிродாрой். роЗро░ுрок்рокிройுроо் роЖрой்рооீроХ ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роОрой்рокродு роЪுропрооிро▓்ро▓ாродு роЗро░ுрок்рокродு. роТро░ு рокாро▓ிройрооாроХ роЗро░ுрок்рокродро▒்роХுроо் роЕрои்родрок்рокாрод்родிро░род்родை роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ் роХொро│்ро╡родро▒்роХுроо் роЙро│்ро│ ро╡ேро▒ுрокாроЯு рокро▒்ро▒ி роОрой்рой роЪொро▓்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்.
роиாрой் роЕродிро▓் роОрои்род ро╡ேро▒ுрокாроЯுроо் роЗро░ுрок்рокродாроп் роиிройைроХ்роХро╡ிро▓்ро▓ை. роЕродு роТро░ு роиிро▓ைропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ை рооро▒ு роиிро▓ைроХ்роХுроХ் роХூроЯ்роЯிроЪ் роЪெро▓்ро╡родுродாрой். роТро░ுро╡роХைропிро▓் роЗрои்род роЗро░ுрооுройைроХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родுроо் ро╡ிроЯுрокроЯ்роЯு роЗро╡்ро╡ிро░рог்роЯு рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ுроо் роОрой்ройро╡ெрой்ро▒ு рокுро░ிрои்родு роХொро│்ро╡родுроо், роЕро╡ро▒்ро▒ிро▓் роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роПро▒்ро▒родு роОродு роОрой்рокродைрод் родேро░்ро╡родுроо் рооுроХ்роХிропроо். роОрои்родрок்рокாро▓ிройрооுроо் роЪாро░ாродிро░ுрок்рокродாро▓், роЕродாро╡родு роОрои்родрок் рокாро▓ிройрод்родிро▓ுроо் роиிро▓ைроХ்роХாродிро░ுрок்рокродாро▓் роироо்рооாро▓் роОрои்родрок் рокாро▓ிройрод்родிрой் роЪெропро▓்роХро│ிро▓ுроо் роИроЯுрокроЯ рооுроЯிроХிро▒родு, роОрои்родрок் рокாро▓ிройрод்родிройாро▓ுроо் роПро▒்рокроЯுрод்родроХ்роХூроЯிроп ро╡ிро│ைро╡ுроХро│ை роПро▒்рокроЯுрод்род рооுроЯிроХிро▒родு, рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роЕройுрокро╡роЩ்роХро│ை роЕройுрокро╡ிроХ்роХ рооுроЯிроХிро▒родு. роЗродுро╡ுроо் роТро░ு роХுро▒ிрок்рокிроЯ்роЯ ро╡ро░ைропро▒ைроХ்роХுро│்родாрой். роЖрогாро▓் роЪிро▓ ро╡ேро▓ைроХро│ை роЪெроп்роп рооுроЯிропுроо், роЕродு рокெрог்рогாро▓் рооுроЯிропாродு.


роЖройாро▓் роЗродுро╡ுроо் роЪுроп роЙрогро░்ро╡ோроЯுродாройே роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо்.
роЖроо். роЗродு роТро░ு рокாродை.

роОрой்рой роЪொро▓்ро▓ ро╡ро░ுроХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்?

рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒ுрокாроЯு роОрой்рокродிро▓் роиுро┤ைро╡родро▒்роХு рооுрой் роиீроЩ்роХро│் рооுро┤ு роЙрогро░்ро╡ோроЯு рооுродрой்рооைрок் рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிрой் рокாрод்родிро░роЩ்роХро│ிро▓் рооுро┤ுрооைропாроХ роИроЯுрокроЯ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо்.


рокாро▓ிрой рооாро▒ுродро▓ிро▓் роЗродுродாрой் ро╡ро┤ி роОрой்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா?
роЗродு роХроЯிройрооாрой ро╡ро┤ிродாрой், роЖройாро▓் роХро▓ாроЪாро░род்родாро▓் роЗрок்рокோродைроХ்роХு роЕройுроородிроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯ роТро░ே ро╡ро┤ி роЗродுродாрой். роЗродு роЙроЩ்роХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроЯுрод்родுроо் ро╡ро┤ி. роЖройாро▓் роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЗрои்род рооாро▒ுродро▓ுроХ்роХு рооுрой் роЗрои்родроХ் роХро▓ாроЪாро░род்родாро▓்,роЪрооூроХрод்родாро▓் роОрок்рокроЯி роироЯрод்родрок்рокроЯுро╡ீро░்роХро│் роОрой்рокродைроЪ் роЪிрои்родிропுроЩ்роХро│். рокெро░ுроо்рокாро▓ாройோро░ுроХ்роХு рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ிро▓роХிропிро░ுрок்рокродுроо் роЕродை рооро▒рои்родு ро╡ிроЯுро╡родро▒்роХுроо் ро╡ிрод்родிропாроЪроо் родெро░ிро╡родிро▓்ро▓ை.


роиாрой் роЗродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு рооாро▒ுрокроЯுроХிро▒ேрой்.
роиாрой் рооேро▓ுроо் рооேро▓ுроо் рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ிроЯுрокроЯுродро▓் роОройுроо் роиிро▓ைроХ்роХு ро╡рои்родுро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой் роОрой்роХிро▒ேрой். роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЖрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог் роОрой்рокродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு роЗрой்ройрооுроо் ро╡ிроЯுрокроЯро╡ிро▓்ро▓ை роОрой்ро▒ு роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ேрой்.


роЖрооாроо்.
роиீроЩ்роХро│் роХுро▒ைрои்родрокроЯ்роЪрооாроХро╡ேройுроо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ை рокாро▓ிройрод்родுроХ்роХு рооுроХ்роХிропрод்родுро╡роо் родро░ாродро╡ро░ாроХ роЙрогро░்ро╡ீро░்роХро│்-роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродு роТро░ு роХро╡ройрод்родிро▓் роОроЯுрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ ро╡ேрог்роЯிроп рооுроХ்роХிропрооாрой ро╡ிро╖ропрооாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХாродு. роЖройாро▓் роЗрой்ро▒ிро░ро╡ு рокроЯுроХ்роХைроХ்роХுрок் рокோроХுроо்рокோродு роиீроЩ்роХро│் рокெрог் роОрой்ро▒ு роЙрогро░்рои்родро╡ாро▒ு роЪெро▓்ро╡ீро░்роХро│். роиாрой் роЕродை роТро░ுрокோродுроо் роЪெроп்родродிро▓்ро▓ை рокроЯுроХ்роХைроХ்роХுроЪ் роЪெро▓்ро▓ுроо்рокோродு роиாрой் роЖрогெрой்ро▒ோ рокெрог்рогெрой்ро▒ோ роТро░ு рокோродுроо் роиிройைрод்родродிро▓்ро▓ை. роОрок்рокோродுроо்.


роЙрог்рооை; роЖройாро▓் роОрой் роЕройுрокро╡роо் ро╡ேро▒ாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு. рокாро▓ிрой роЕроЯைропாро│роЩ்роХро│ைрод் родாрог்роЯி роЗро░ுрок்рокродு роОрой்рокродிро▓் рооро▒்ро▒ொро░ு роЕрогுроХுрооுро▒ைропுроо் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு. рокெро░ுроо்рокாро▓ாрой роЖрой்рооீроХрок் рокропிро▒்роЪிроХро│் роЙроЩ்роХро│ை ро▓ௌроХீроХ роЙро▓роХிро▓் рооூро┤்роХроЯிроХ்роХроХ் роХூроЯிроп ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு рооாро▒роЪ் роЪொро▓்роХிрой்ро▒рой, роХாро▓роо் родாрог்роЯிроп, роОрог்рогроо் родாрог்роЯிроп, роЕрог்роЯро╡ெро│ிропைрод் родாрог்роЯிроп, рооройродைрод் родாрог்роЯிроп роТрой்ро▒ோроЯு роТрой்ро▒ுро╡родு рокро▒்ро▒ிрок் рокேроЪுроХிрой்ро▒рой. роЖройாро▓ுроо் роиாроо், роироо் рокாро▓ிройрооாроХро╡ே роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ோроо். роЖройாро▓் роЕродு роЖрой்рооீроХ рооுрой்ройேро▒்ро▒род்родிрой் роЕроЯிрок்рокроЯைроХ் роХுро▒ிропீроЯோ роЕро▓்ро▓родு рооро▒родிропோ роЕро▓்ро▓. 

роиாроо் роироо் роЙроЯро▓ோроЯே роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ோроо், роЗро╡்ро╡ுроЯро▓ுроХ்роХாрой ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокாроЯுроХро│ை ро╡ெро│ிропிроЯுроХிро▒ோроо், роЗропро▒்роХைропாроХ, роЖройாро▓் роЕродை рооுройைрои்родு роЪெроп்ропாродு, роироЯிрок்рокாроХро╡ோ, ро╡ேро▒ெро╡் рокாродிрок்рокோ роЗро▓்ро▓ாрооро▓். роЕродு рооро░்ро▓ிрой் роорой்ро▒ோ рокோрой்ро▒ிро░ுрои்родாро▓ுроо் роЪро░ி роЕро▓்ро▓родு роУро░்рокாро▓் роИро░்рок்рокுроЯைропро╡ро░் рокோро▓ிро░ுрои்родாро▓ுроо் роЪро░ி, роЕродு ро╡ெро▒ுроо் роЕрокிроиропрооாроХро╡ே роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо். роЪро░ிродாройே?

роЕрокிроиропроЩ்роХро│் роОрок்рокோродுрооே ро╡ிро│ைропாроЯ்роЯுрод் родрой்рооைропுроЯைропро╡ை. роЕро╡ை роироо்рооைроЪ் роЪிро░ிроХ்роХ ро╡ைроХ்роХிрой்ро▒рой. роЬெрой் родுро▒ро╡ிроХро│ிро▓் рокро▓ро░் роЗрок்рокроЯிроЪ் роЪிро░ிроХ்роХ ро╡ைрод்родро╡ро░்роХро│்родாрой். родாро╡ோро╡ிрой் роХுро░ுроХ்роХро│ுроо் роЕрок்рокроЯிропே. роЪுро╡ாроЩ் роЯ்ро╕ூ роТро░ு рокுро░роЯ்роЪிроХ்роХாро░ро░். роЗрой்ро▒ைроХ்роХு роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо் рокро▓ро░ை ро╡ிроЯ рооிроХ роЙропро░்рои்родро╡ро░்.

роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЗродு роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродு роОройுроо் роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ைропே роХேроЯ்роЯுроХ் роХொрог்роЯிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│். роОройроХ்роХு роиро▓்ро▓родு, роХெроЯ்роЯродு роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் роОрой்ройро╡ெрой்ро▒ு родெро░ிропாродு, роЪро░ி, родрок்рокு роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் роОрой்ройро╡ெрой்ро▒ு родெро░ிропாродு. роОройро╡ே рооீрог்роЯுроо் роОрой்ройுроЯрой் роиாрой் рооுро░рог்рокроЯ்роЯுроХ் роХொро│்роХிро▒ேрой். роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЕрод்родройை рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிрой் родрой்рооைроХро│ைропுроо் роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ் роХொрог்роЯாро▓்родாрой் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை роЕроЯைроп рооுроЯிропுрооா? роОрой்ро▒ாро▓், роЗро▓்ро▓ை. роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЗрои்родрок் рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродு роОрок்рокроЯிрок்рокроЯ்роЯ ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│ைрод் родрой்ройிроЯрод்родிро▓் роХொрог்роЯுро│்ро│родு роОрой்ро▒ு роЪோродிроХ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо். ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│ிро▓் роЗро░ுрои்родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் рокாро▓ிройрок் рокாро░்ро╡ைропை роЕроХро▒்ро▒ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо். роЙрог்рооைропிро▓் роЕро╡்ро╡ிро┤ுрооிропроЩ்роХро│் роОродро▒்роХாроХ роЙро│்ро│ройро╡ோ роЕродро▒்роХாроХ роЕро╡ро▒்ро▒ை рокாро▓ிройроо் роЪாро░ாродு роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ்роХொро│்ро│ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо். роЕродாро╡родு роЙроЩ்роХро│ிрой் роЕроЯைропாро│роо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роОро╡்ро╡ро│ро╡ு рооுроХ்роХிропрооாройродு? роЖрогெрой்роХிро▒ роЕроЯைропாро│род்родோроЯு роЙроЩ்роХро│ைрок் рокாро░்роХ்роХுроо் рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░்роХро│ிрой் рокாро░்ро╡ை роОро╡்ро╡ро│ро╡ு рооுроХ்роХிропрооாройродு? рокெрог்рогெрой்роХிро▒ роЕроЯைропாро│род்родோроЯு роОро╡்ро╡ро│ро╡ு рооுроХ்роХிропрооாройродு? роЙроЩ்роХро│ிроЯрод்родிро▓ுроо், роОрой்ройிроЯрод்родிро▓ுроо், роЖрогெрой்ро▒ுроо், рокெрог்рогெрой்ро▒ுроо் рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роЙро▒ுродிрок்рокроЯுрод்родுроХிро▒ роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродிроХро░ிроХ்роХிро▒ ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│் роОрой்ройெрой்рой? роЕродுродாрой் рокாро▓ிройрод்родோроЯு роЙроЩ்роХро│ைрод் родொроЯро░்рокுрокроЯுрод்родுроХிро▒родு.


роЗродைроЪ் роЪро░ிропாрой рооுро▒ைропிро▓் роОрок்рокроЯி роЕрогுроХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо்?
роОрой்ройைрок் рокொро▒ுрод்родро╡ро░ைропிро▓் родுрогிрои்родு роЪெроп்ро╡родுродாрой். роОрой் рокுро▒род்родோро▒்ро▒род்родை роиீроЩ்роХро│் роХро╡ройிрок்рокродைрок் рокро▒்ро▒ி роиாрой் роХро╡ро▓ைрок்рокроЯாрооро▓ிро░ுрок்рокродு. роОрой்ройாро▓் роЕродை роОро│்ро│ро▓ுроЯрой் роХроЯроХ்роХ рооுроЯிро╡родு. рокோродிроЪрод்родுро╡ро░் роЪொрой்ройродு рокோро▓: роЙроЩ்роХро│ைрод் родாро┤்ро╡ுрокроЯுрод்родிроХ் роХொро│்ро│ுроЩ்роХро│். роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХாроХроХ் роХроЯ்роЯрооைроХ்роХрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│ ро╡ிродிроХро│ை ро╡ிроЯ்роЯு ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒ுроЩ்роХро│்.

ро╡ிродிроХро│ை ро╡ிроЯ்роЯு ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒ுрокро╡ро░்роХро│் рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░்роХро│ை ро╡ிроЯ рокро▓род்родுроЯрой் роЗро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ாро░்роХро│்.роПройெройிро▓் роЕро╡ро░்роХро│் роЪрооூроХ, роХро▓ாроЪாро░, роородроХ் роХроЯ்роЯро│ைроХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒род் родுрогிроХிро▒ாро░்роХро│். ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒ிропро╡ுроЯрой் роХிроЯைроХ்роХுроо் роЪுродрои்родிро░роо் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் роЖро▒்ро▒ро▓், роироо்рооை, роЗродிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ெро│ிропேро▒род் родுрогிро╡ிро▓்ро▓ாродро╡ро░்роХро│் рокропрод்родுроЯройுроо், ро╡ிропрок்рокுроЯройுроо் рокாро░்роХ்роХ ро╡ைроХ்роХிро▒родு. роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЗродு рокோрой்ро▒ு рокро▓ родро│ைроХро│ை роЙроЯைрод்родெро▒ிрои்родро╡ро░். роЕродை рооро▒ைроХ்роХ рооுропро▓ாродு рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░்роХро│ுроХ்роХுроо் роХро▒்ро▒ுроХ் роХொроЯுрок்рокро╡ро░். родро│ைроХро│ை роЙроЯைрод்родெро▒ிроХைропிро▓் роПро▒்рокроЯுроо் рокро▓род்родை роЕройுрокро╡ிрод்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│ா?

роЖроо், роЪிро▓ ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ை роиாрой் родроХро░்род்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой். родроЯைроХро│ை роЙроЯைрок்рокродெрой்рокродு роЪрооுродாропрод்родிро▓் роТро░ு рооройிродройைроХ் роХீро┤ாройро╡ройாроХроХ் роХாроЯ்роЯுроо். роЗродிро▓் роЕрокрод்родрооாрой роЙрог்рооை роОрой்ройро╡ெрой்ро▒ாро▓் роЕродுродாрой் роЕро╡ройுроХ்роХுрок் рокро▓роо். роТро░ு рооுроЯ்роЯாро│் роЕро░роЪ рокродро╡ிропிро▓் роЗро░ுрок்рокродு рокோро▓். роЗродைрод் родроХро░்род்родெро▒ிрои்род рокிрой் роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХு роПро▒்рокроЯுроо் роЪுродрои்родிро░рооெрой்рокродு роЪрооூроХроо் родро░ுроо் роЕро╡рооாройроо் роОройுроо் роЪро╡ுроХ்роХроЯிропிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ிроЯுродро▓ை. роОрой்ройை роЕро╡рооாройрок்рокроЯுрод்род рооுроЯிропாродு. роОрой்рой роЪெроп்роп рооுроЯிропுроо் роЙроЩ்роХро│ாро▓்? роОрой்ройை ро╡ேро▒ு рокெропро░்роХро│ாро▓் роЕро┤ைрок்рокீро░்роХро│ா? роиாрой் роХрог்роЯு роХொро│்ро│рок் рокோро╡родிро▓்ро▓ை. роЙро│்роироХைрок்рокோроЯு роОрой்ройை  ‘ро▓ெро╕்рокிропрой்’ роОрой்рокீро░்роХро│ா? роЖрооாроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро╡ேрой். роиீ роТро░ு роЖрог் роОрой்рокீро░்роХро│ா? роЪро░ிродாрой் роОрой்рокேрой். роЕро▓்ро▓родு ’роХுро▒ிропை роЕро▒ுрод்родுроХ் роХொрог்роЯро╡рой்’ роОрой்ро▒ாро▓் ’роЗро▓்ро▓ை роЕродை ро╡ெро│ிрок்рокроХ்роХрооாроХрод் родிро░ுрок்рокிроХ் роХொрог்роЯேрой்’ роОрой்рокேрой். роиாрой் роЕро╡рооாройрок்рокроЯுроо் ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│் рооிроХроХ் роХுро▒ைро╡ு, роЗродுродாрой் роЪுродрои்родிро░роо்.

рокாро▓ிройроо் родройроХ்роХெрой்ро▒ு роЪிро▓ роЪрооூроХрок் рокொро▒ுрок்рокுроХро│ைроХ் роХொрог்роЯுро│்ро│родு. роЕродை роиீроЩ்роХро│் роПро▒்роХро▓ாроо் роЕро▓்ро▓родு рооро▒ுроХ்роХро▓ாроо்; рооро▒ுрок்рокродு роОрой்ро▒ рооுроЯிро╡ெроЯுрод்родாро▓் роиீроЩ்роХро│் роЕро╡рооாройроо் роЕроЯைроп роиேро░ிроЯுроо் - роЕродை роТро░ு ро╡ிро│ைропாроЯ்роЯாроХ роиீроЩ்роХро│் роОроЯுрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ுроо்ро╡ро░ை. роЗродு роЮாройрод்родை роиெро░ுроЩ்роХிроп роиிро▓ை.  “роЖрооாроо்,роОройроХ்роХு роЗродு рокிроЯிрод்родிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு роЕродройாро▓் роЪெроп்роХிро▒ேрой்”роОрой்рокродு. роТро░ே роЪрооропрод்родிро▓் роЖрог், рокெрог், роЪிро▒ுро╡рой், роЪிро▒ுрооி, роЕрод்родை, рооாрооா, роЪроХோродро░ி, роЪроХோродро░рой், роЖроЪிро░ிропро░், рооாрогро╡ро░் роОрой்ро▒ு роОрод்родройை рокாрод்родிро░роЩ்роХро│்? рооாро▒ி рооாро▒ி рооாро▒ி рооாро▒ி рооாро▒ி…….. роЮாройроороЯைрои்родродு рокோро▓் роЗро░ுроХ்роХாродு? роХроЯைроЪிропிро▓் роиாрой் роЙрогро░்рои்родு роХொрог்роЯுро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой், роЗроЪ்роЪрооூроХрод்родிро▓் роОрой்ройை роиிро▒ைроХ்роХроХ் роХூроЯிроп роТро░ு роЪрооூроХ роЕроЯைропாро│роо் роЗро▓்ро▓ро╡ே роЗро▓்ро▓ை. роОройроХ்роХுрок் рокிроЯிрод்род рокாрод்родிро░роЩ்роХро│ிро▓் роТро░ு ро╡ாройроо்рокாроЯி рокோро▓் родிро░ிрои்родு роХொрог்роЯிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒ேрой்.

роТро░ுро╡ேро│ை роиாро│ை ро╡ிроЯிрои்родродுроо் рокро░ிрогாроороо் рооூро▓рооாроХ роЕройைро╡ро░ுрооே рокாро▓்рооாро▒ுрокாроЯு роЕроЯைрои்родு роЗроо்рооுродрой்рооைрок் рокாро▓ிройроЩ்роХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு рооாро▒ிро╡ிроЯ்роЯாро▓் роОрой்рой роиிроХро┤ுроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роиிройைроХ்роХிро▒ீро░்роХро│்?
рооுродро▓ிро▓் ро╡ிропроХ்роХрод்родроХ்роХ ро╡роХைропிро▓் роороХ்роХро│் роОроХ்роХுрод்родрок்рокாроХ роЗро░ுрок்рокாро░்роХро│். родроо் рокாро▓ிройрод்родுроХ்роХுро░ிроп роЪெроп்роХைроХро│் роОродுро╡ுрооிро░ுроХ்роХாродு. роЗро╡்ро╡ுро▓роХிро▓் ро╡ாро┤ро╡ுроо், рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░ோроЯு рокро┤роХро╡ுроо் роЕро╡ро░்роХро│் рооீрог்роЯுроо் роХро▒்ро▒ுроХ்роХொро│்ро│ ро╡ேрог்роЯிропிро░ுроХ்роХுроо். роЪрооூроХрод்родிро▓் роПро▒்рокроЯுрод்родрок்рокроЯ்роЯுро│்ро│ роЖрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог்роХро│ுроХ்роХாрой роОродைропுроо் роЕро╡ро░்роХро│ாро▓் роЙрокропோроХрок்рокроЯுрод்род рооுроЯிропாродு. роЖрог் рооро▒்ро▒ுроо் рокெрог் роОрой்рокродை роороЯ்роЯுрооே роЪாро░்рои்родு роЗро╡்ро╡ுро▓роХிро▓் роОро╡்ро╡ро│ро╡ு ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு родெро░ிропுрооா? роЗро░рог்роЯைропுроо் родро╡ிро░்род்родு рооுропро▒்роЪி роЪெроп்родு рокாро░ுроЩ்роХро│். роТро░ு рооீроЪை ро╡ைрод்родுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ுроЩ்роХро│். роТро░ுроиாро│் роороХ்роХро│ைрод் родிроХைроХ்роХ ро╡ைропுроЩ்роХро│். роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЪுро▓рокрооாроХ роЗродைроЪ் роЪெроп்ропро▓ாроо், роЗроо்рооூрой்ро▒ு роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ை роЙрог்рооைропாроХ роЙроЩ்роХро│ுроХ்роХுро│் роХேроЯ்роЯுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ுроЩ்роХро│். роЖрогெрой்рокродு роОрой்рой? рокெрог்рогெрой்рокродு роОрой்рой? роиாроо் роПрой் роЗродு роЕро▓்ро▓родு роЕродிро▓் роЗро░ுроХ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо்? роЙро▓роХிро▓் рокெро░ுроо்рокாро▓ாройோро░் роЗроо்рооூрой்ро▒ு роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ைроХ் роХேроЯ்роЯுроХ் роХொрог்роЯாро▓் роЗрои்родрок் рокூрооிропே рооாро▒ிро╡ிроЯுроо்.

рокாро▓ிрой  роЕроЯைропாро│роо் роХுро▒ிрод்род роЗроХ்роХேро│்ро╡ிроХро│ை роЙроЩ்роХро│ைрок் рокோро▓ро╡ே рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро░்роХро│ுроо் роЖрой்рооீроХ ро╡ро┤ிропிро▓் роХேроЯ்роХ ро╡ேрог்роЯுроо் роОрой்ро▒ு роЪொро▓்ро╡ீро░்роХро│ா?

роЮாройрод்родை роЕроЯைропுроо் ро╡ро┤ிроХро│ிро▓் роТрой்ро▒ு, рокாро▓ிройроо் ро╡ро┤ிропாроХ роЕроЯைродро▓். рокாро▓ிройроо் роОрой்рокродை ро╡ைрод்родு ро╡ро┤роЩ்роХрок்рокроЯுроо் роЪро▓ுроХைроХро│ிро▓ிро░ுрои்родு ро╡ிроЯுрокроЯுро╡родு. роЕродுродாрой் роиாрой் роЪெроп்родродு. ‘роЕро┤роХாрой рокெрог்’ ‘роКрооைрок் рокெрог்’ роОройுроо் роЪро▓ுроХைропைропுроо் роЙродро▒ி ро╡ிроЯ்роЯேрой். роЗродு роЗрок்рокோродு роТро░ு ро╡ிро│ைропாроЯ்роЯு рокோро▓ாроХிро╡ிроЯ்роЯродு. роиாрой் роЪொро▓்ро╡родு роЗродைрод்родாрой், роЪிро▓ро░ுроХ்роХு родிропாройрод்родிрой் ро╡ро┤ிропை роЖро░ாроп்ро╡родை ро╡ிроЯро╡ுроо் рокாро▓ிрой ро╡ро┤ி роОро│ிродாроХ роЗро░ுроХ்роХுроо். родிропாройроо் роОрой்рокродே роТро░ுроиிро▓ைрок்рокроЯுрод்родுродро▓்родாрой். рокாро▓ிройрод்родை рооாро▒்ро▒ிропрооைроХ்роХ роОро╡்ро╡ро│ро╡ு роТро░ுрооுроХрок்рокроЯுрод்родுродро▓் родேро╡ைропெрой்ро▒ு родெро░ிропுрооா? роЗродுро╡ுроо் родிропாройрок் рокропிро▒்роЪிродாрой். роХрогроХ்роХро▒்ро▒ ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ிро▓் рооிроХ роиுроЯ்рокрооாроХ роХро╡ройрод்родைроЪ் роЪெро▓ுрод்род ро╡ேрог்роЯிропிро░ுроХ்роХுроо். роОро▓்ро▓ாро╡ро▒்ро▒ைропுроо் роЪெроп்родு ро╡ிроЯ рооுроЯிропாродெрой்ро▒ாро▓ுроо் роЗропрой்ро▒ро╡ро░ை роЙроЩ்роХро│் роХро╡ройрод்родைрок் рокро▓ роЗроЯроЩ்роХро│ிро▓் роХுро╡ிропுроЩ்роХро│், рооро▒்ро▒ро╡ро▒்ро▒ை ро╡ிроЯ்роЯுрод்родро│்ро│ுроЩ்роХро│். роЕродுродாрой் родிропாройроо். роиீроЩ்роХро│் ‘роЬெрой்ройுроо், рокாро▓ிройрок் рокро░ாрооро░ிрок்рокுроХ் роХро▓ைропுроо்’ роОрой்рокродிро▓் роЗро░ுрои்родாро▓் роЕродுро╡ுроо் роТро░ு родிропாрой рооுро▒ைродாрой். роиாрой் роЪொро▓்ро╡родெро▓்ро▓ாроо் рокாро▓ிройрод்родிро▓் роХро╡ройрод்родோроЯு роЗро░ுрок்рокிрой் роЕродு роЮாройрод்родுроХ்роХாрой ро╡ро┤ி роОрой்рокродுродாрой். роЕродு роОрой்ройை ро╡ெроХு родொро▓ைро╡ுроХ்роХு роироЯрод்родிроХ் роХொрог்роЯு ро╡рои்родுро│்ро│родு, ро╡ிро╖ропроЩ்роХро│ைрок் рокுро░ிрои்родு роХொро│்ро│ро╡ுроо், роОройроХ்роХுрок் рокுро░ிропாродро╡ро▒்ро▒ை роПро▒்ро▒ுроХ் роХொро│்ро│ро╡ுроо், роОрой்ройுроЯைроп роироХைроЪ்роЪுро╡ைропுрогро░்ро╡ை роЕродிроХрок்рокроЯுрод்родро╡ுроо் ро╡ேро▒ெродைропுроо் ро╡ிроЯ роЙродро╡ிропிро░ுроХ்роХிро▒родு.